Re: NONIS Patch

2003-10-11 Thread Andreas Schockenhoff
Hello, On Monday 01 September 2003 12:24, Stephane FRITSCH wrote: > Why not simply undefining YPDOMAIN if you don't want > NIS ? > > BTW, does this patch actually work ? It seems > you are using csh syntax in a sh script It is linux and sh is bash. But it is not nice! You are right the patch does

Re: Réf. : NONIS Patch

2003-09-01 Thread Anders Jackson
"Stephane FRITSCH" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Why not simply undefining YPDOMAIN if you don't want > NIS ? Because it's more obvious what it means to have NIS or NONIS defined then of NIS defined or YPDOMAIN not defined? /Jackson

Réf. : NONIS Patch

2003-09-01 Thread Stephane FRITSCH
Why not simply undefining YPDOMAIN if you don't want NIS ? BTW, does this patch actually work ? It seems you are using csh syntax in a sh script Stephane

NONIS Patch

2003-08-30 Thread Andreas Schockenhoff
Hi, I am back to fai. Great software! If I define the class NONIS I think on the target computer no NIS should be install (correct me if this is a bad idea). Here is a small patch that will do this. === RCS file: /var/lib/cvs/fai/c