Re: Which Distro/FAI Version to use? (was Re: FAI 3.1 released)

2006-11-22 Thread Henning Sprang
On 11/22/06, Kenneth Jacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Other than the updates, is there any reason *not* to use Debian? (Hmmm, just checked ... 'sarge' apparently is only up to fai-2.8.4 ...) On the download location on the fai website you find fai 2.10 I think there are some mails on the ar

Which Distro/FAI Version to use? (was Re: FAI 3.1 released)

2006-11-22 Thread Kenneth Jacker
>> Can I use v3.1?Would v2.10.1 be "OK"? tl> Ubuntu edgy includes FAI 3.1ubuntu1. But FAI 3.1 may also work tl> for dapper. Another idea: just stick with pure Debian. These lab machines certainly won't need the "latest and greatest". Other than the updates, is there any reason *not*

Re: fai version

2006-03-22 Thread Michael Tautschnig
> hi, > > I do have two question: > > 1) is there some motivation to install the latest version of fai which is > 2.9.1 > when I'm having the stock one from debian (2.8.4) > > 2) how to try step by step the scripts files, because they are giving a lot of > errors, when they actually run smoothl

Re: fai version

2006-03-22 Thread Thomas Lange
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 17:03:55 +0100, Cedric BRINER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: > 1) is there some motivation to install the latest version of fai which is 2.9.1 > when I'm having the stock one from debian (2.8.4) I depends. If you're happy, go on with 2.8.4sarge1 which has some

fai version

2006-03-22 Thread Cedric BRINER
hi, I do have two question: 1) is there some motivation to install the latest version of fai which is 2.9.1 when I'm having the stock one from debian (2.8.4) 2) how to try step by step the scripts files, because they are giving a lot of errors, when they actually run smoothly on FAI_ACTION=insta