> On Tue, 3 Jun 2014 17:13:30 -0500, Peter Keller
> said:
> Does FAI have a means to specify a "do this once" type of thing when the
> client reboots into the installed distro?
Yes, you can do this with a /etc/rc.local script that removes
itself after execution. In the simple exa
Hi Pete
On 06/04/2014 12:13 AM, Peter Keller wrote:
> Does FAI have a means to specify a "do this once" type of thing when the
> client reboots into the installed distro? Or am I on my own for
> enforcing that sort of thing--because FAI is out of the picture totally
> after reboot?
FAI is usually
Hello,
Does FAI have a means to specify a "do this once" type of thing when the
client reboots into the installed distro? Or am I on my own for
enforcing that sort of thing--because FAI is out of the picture totally
after reboot?
I ask because the installation kernel is different than the distro
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 05:32:39PM +0300, Toomas Tamm wrote:
> Does this happen while booting FAI, or when booting into the installed
> system?
If you're booting into the installed system, I have an outside
suggestion, replace your pxelinux.cfg/default with:
LABEL fai-generated
MENU LABEL Boot
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 12:10:09PM +0200, Thomas Neumann wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 June 2014 12:42:38 Toomas Tamm wrote:
> > On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 01:46 +0200, Holger Parplies wrote:
> >> I'm not completely sure why anyone would *not* want to 'fai-chboot -o
> >> default'.
It turns out, that I can't u
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 16:42:02 Thomas Lange wrote:
>> There are a number of reports around these problems, each referencing
>> one another, but I lost my way somewhere through this... Is there any
>> real solution for this?
> Kerim (a colleague of mine) started working on LVM things in
> setup-
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 16:47:57 Thomas Lange wrote:
> > Important feature requests:
> > - setup-storage should be able to configure btrfs volumes (at least
> root
> > volumes, subvolumes would be nice too)
> I also like this idea. Let's see if we can include something useful
> into
> On Mon, 26 May 2014 12:15:45 +0200, Thomas Neumann
> said:
> but also the underlying Linux::LVM is pretty seriously
> broken. (Roland's patch does work, but I'm not sure if it's really the
> 'correct' fix.)
IMO, we should first try to fix the problems in this Perl librar
> On Mon, 26 May 2014 11:00:29 +0200, Andreas Heinlein
> said:
> Use liblinux-lvm-perl 0.17-1 (from the FAI repos, apparently with
> Thomas' patch removed again):
Can you please give more details about this. Which patch was removed?
Is it removed in the Debian version or in upstr
On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 14:32 +0100, Rui Teixeira wrote:
> I already have installed firmware-realtek. Seems
[...]
> but not for module r8169:
> rtl_nic/rtl8168g-3.fw
> rtl_nic/rtl8168g-2.fw
[...]
Apparently I did not pay sufficient attention to detail, which versions
of the firmware you are lack
FAI 4.2 was released today. It now supports ISO hybrid images, which
can be put onto a CD or which can be written to USB stick via dd(1).
I've also created new FAI CD ISO images, which are available on the
FAI project web page. One installs Debian 6 with a small list of
pacakges or a XFCE desktop.
I already have installed firmware-realtek. Seems that firmware-realtek package
include:
* Realtek RTL8192SU firmware, version 902B (RTL8192SU/rtl8192sfw.bin)
* Realtek RTL8105E-1 firmware (rtl_nic/rtl8105e-1.fw)
* Realtek RTL8111D-1/RTL8168D-1 firmware (rtl_nic/rtl8168d-1.fw)
* Realtek RTL8111D
On Tue, Jun 03, 2014 at 01:52:14PM +0100, Rui Teixeira wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm having an issue with some firmware. Googling I've found som e
> information, installing Realtek firmware but it doesn't fix my issue.
>
> There's the log installing the system (image).
> http://oi57.tinypic.com/316axy1.jpg
>
Hi,
I'm having an issue with some firmware. Googling I've found som e
information, installing Realtek firmware but it doesn't fix my issue.
There's the log installing the system (image).
http://oi57.tinypic.com/316axy1.jpg
Any help will be appreciated, I think this problem is the reason why the
i
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 12:42:38 Toomas Tamm wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 01:46 +0200, Holger Parplies wrote:
>> I'm not completely sure why anyone would *not* want to 'fai-chboot -o
>> default'.
> I am one who does not, here are my reasons:
Same here. My motivation is that a 'boot to fai' is a
On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 01:46 +0200, Holger Parplies wrote:
> I'm not completely sure why anyone would *not* want to 'fai-chboot -o
> default'.
I am one who does not, here are my reasons:
* It introduces additional complexity into the boot process, requiring
access to the boot server (or network
16 matches
Mail list logo
