Re: FAI with pre-release bullseye yielding inconsistent network names

2021-01-19 Diskussionsfäden Thomas Lange
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 21:00:28 +0100, Stefan Möding > said: > It seems the path based name is used when booting the NFSROOT while the slot > based name is used when the machine is rebooted after installation. To me > that looks like a problem with the NFSROOT like missing

Re: FAI with pre-release bullseye yielding inconsistent network names

2021-01-19 Diskussionsfäden Stefan Möding
fai1...@macrotex.net writes: > I am already using that patch. The problem seems to be that the altname > returned by "ip link show eth0" in 30-interface is "enp11s0" and hence > that is the filename what 30-network puts into /etc/network/interfaces.d, but > when the new system boots the name in

Re: FAI with pre-release bullseye yielding inconsistent network names

2021-01-19 Diskussionsfäden Thomas Lange
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2021 06:57:26 -0800, fai1...@macrotex.net said: > I am already using that patch. The problem seems to be that the altname > returned by "ip link show eth0" in 30-interface is "enp11s0" and hence > that is the filename what 30-network puts into >

Re: FAI with pre-release bullseye yielding inconsistent network names

2021-01-19 Diskussionsfäden fai1107
On 1/19/2021 1:58 AM, Thomas Lange wrote: On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:23:05 +0100, Thomas Lange said: > I found out that "udevadm trigger" is executed when doing the > inventory but not when doing the installation. I found out, that I've added a patch after the release of 5.9.4 which

Re: FAI with pre-release bullseye yielding inconsistent network names

2021-01-19 Diskussionsfäden Thomas Lange
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:23:05 +0100, Thomas Lange > said: > I found out that "udevadm trigger" is executed when doing the > inventory but not when doing the installation. I found out, that I've added a patch after the release of 5.9.4 which tries to get the interface name if