FAI + Linux Mint?

2012-06-14 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
Hi, I searched the wiki but couldn't find any references to Linux Mint. Has anyone used FAI to install mint? In that case, is it just like Ubuntu for the main edition, and like Debian sid for LMDE, or does something have to be done differently? /Per

Re: FAI 3.3.3 released

2010-02-03 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
Thomas Lange wrote: > FAI 3.3.3 is running with Ubuntu lucid Great news! Will the packages make it into the Ubuntu repository? If so, when? Does it require a Ubuntu nfsroot, or will it work as well with a Debian nfsroot + Ubuntu basefile? I'm currently installing jaunty from a lenny server wit

Re: Fai on Ubuntu 9.10 status?

2009-09-05 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
Henning Sprang wrote: > I'm advocating, that it would have been good at least update and > dirinstall would be available in Ubuntu. Softupdate would do for me. You can always install the base in some other way (Debian FAI server, clonezilla, g4l, ...) and then use softupdate to get things exactly

Re: Fai on Ubuntu 9.10 status?

2009-09-05 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
Henning Sprang wrote: > That wasn't my intention at all, I just wondered if I missed something, > maybe a decision to implement the CUT > concept(http://kitenet.net/~joey/code/debian/cut/) on a 6 month base... Interesting. That would be exactly what we would need to be able to stay with Debian o

Re: Fai on Ubuntu 9.10 status?

2009-09-04 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
Thomas Lange wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:47:51 +0200, Per Foreby said: > > > Our setup depends heavily on softupdate, and we're in the process of > > switching from Debian to Ubuntu on desktop, so this sounds like bad > news. > I ca

Re: Fai on Ubuntu 9.10 status?

2009-09-04 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
Henning Sprang wrote: > Per Foreby wrote: >> Our setup depends heavily on softupdate, and we're in the process of >> switching from Debian to Ubuntu on desktop, so this sounds like bad news. > > Good to have some more people tell this! > > When this decision was m

Re: Fai on Ubuntu 9.10 status?

2009-09-04 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
Thomas Lange wrote: >> On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 21:42:14 +0200, adrian15 >> said: > > > Thomas Lange and I did some work together on improving the FAI Ubuntu > > package so that it worked on Ubuntu 9.10. > We (three people) decided to remove the fai packages from Ubuntu 9.10, > since

Problems with web/wiki?

2009-08-18 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
Hi, I haven't been able to reach the fai web pages or the wiki this week. i have tried from two different locations, but no web servers in the informatik.uni-koeln.de domain seem to be reachable. -per

Re: Thank you and good bye.

2009-05-07 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
Henning Sprang wrote: > Per Foreby wrote: >> Can I use this method on a lenny server with the stock fai package, or >> do I need a newer version from the fai repository? > > Lenny version should do fine. > >> What about softupdate after such an installation? I

Re: Thank you and good bye.

2009-05-07 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
Henning Sprang wrote: > Russ Allbery wrote: >> Debian-based FAI cannot build Ubuntu intrepid or jaunty systems; the >> boot from the NFS root fails. That's due to the initramfs-tools and >> live-initramfs problems. > > But that happens only when you try to install from an Ubuntu NFSRoot - > whic

GPG signing: almost there

2007-08-28 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
Thanks for the GPG signature. Unfortunately somthing is missing: $ grep fai /etc/apt/sources.list deb http://www.informatik.uni-koeln.de/fai/download etch koeln $ apt-key list|tail -5 pub 1024D/AB9B66FD 2000-08-18 uid Thomas Lange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> uid Thomas

fai repository untrusted

2007-08-25 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
Why isn't the fai repository gpg signed? It would be nice to be able to use the latest and greatest fai version without having to decrease security. But if I don't add apt settings (like /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/10fai in the nfsroot), all package upgrades will fail when running a softupdate. So

SW_RAID in 3.x

2007-08-22 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
I have a few computers using raid1, and in 2.10 I used the tricks at http://faiwiki.informatik.uni-koeln.de/index.php/User:Svamberg/Software_RAID. In addition to this, I had to run mkinitrd and create mdadm.conf in a script. Since sarge there has been some changes in software raid, making mdad

Re: FAI 3.2 released

2007-08-22 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Thomas Lange wrote: Then root-path is not needed in dhcpd.conf. Not needed, but conveniant since make-fai-bootfloppy doesn't add the nfsroot parameter by default. > By the way, why does burniso() in fai-cd use cdrecord? Shouldn't it be > wodim these days? As long

Re: FAI 3.2 released

2007-08-22 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Thomas Lange wrote: On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 16:23:37 +0200 (CEST), Per Foreby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > But make-fai-bootfloppy uses $NFSROOT/boot/vnlinu?-*. If that is a > standard debian kernel it won't work without initramfs. Yes, and both won&

Re: FAI 3.2 released

2007-08-22 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, On Wednesday 22 August 2007 15:04, Per Foreby wrote: Will softupdate work if a use fai-client 3.2 against a 3.1.8 server? With softupdates you don't use a server - except one to hold the configuration files. But the configuration from

Re: FAI 3.2 released

2007-08-22 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Thomas Lange wrote: On Wed, 22 Aug 2007 15:04:52 +0200 (CEST), Per Foreby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Will softupdate work if a use fai-client 3.2 against a 3.1.8 server? I'm not sure, but I guess it should work. Ok, I'll give it a try an report

Re: FAI 3.2 released

2007-08-22 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
Two questions: Will softupdate work if a use fai-client 3.2 against a 3.1.8 server? What happens to the small boot cd (make-fai-bootfloppy -B -i ...). Is that option still available now that fai uses initramfs? (I use that method for older PXE bios versions that don't honour next-server.) /P

Random hangs during installation

2007-08-20 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
Using fai-kernels 1.17+etch2 the installation hangs at random points during the installation. Sometimes it hangs during boot, typically at "Waiting for /dev to be populated". Other times it hangs during package transfer och some other point. As far as I can see, it looks totally random, and hap

Re: Radeon problem (off-topic?)

2007-08-20 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Per Foreby wrote: This probably has nothing to do with fai, but I'm getting desperate, and there is a lot of wise poeple on this list, so here goes: A have a lot of old computers with Radeon 9250 graphics (AGP). The have worked just fine running sarge, but I can&

Radeon problem (off-topic?)

2007-08-20 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
This probably has nothing to do with fai, but I'm getting desperate, and there is a lot of wise poeple on this list, so here goes: A have a lot of old computers with Radeon 9250 graphics (AGP). The have worked just fine running sarge, but I can't get them to work with etch (using the stock ati

Re: softupdate

2007-08-20 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, On Sunday 19 August 2007 17:41, Per Foreby wrote: Everytime, until I run "aptitude update" (manually, or in the softupdate hook as I described). Then aptitude update is not run and should be. IMO it would be good to have it in

Re: softupdate

2007-08-19 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, Holger Levsen wrote: Hi, On Sunday 19 August 2007 16:48, Per Foreby wrote: After an "aptitude update" the complaints are gone, and the packages are installable with softupdate. Does the authentication problem occur after every softupdate or only at the first

softupdate

2007-08-19 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
We have our own repository for local packages. It is gpg signed with our own key, and the key is present in /etc/apt/trusted.gpg in the nfsroot, which is copied to the installed client (verified with "apt-key list"). This works fine on the initial installation, but when I add more packages and

Re: ROOTCMD in cfengine script

2007-08-18 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
On Sat, 18 Aug 2007, Thomas Lange wrote: On Sat, 18 Aug 2007 18:52:20 +0200 (CEST), Per Foreby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > Is it possible to use $ROOTCMD in cfengine scripts? > I update a configuration file for tex-common, and want to run > update-texmf after tha

Add to default fai.conf

2007-08-18 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
When running a softupdate, two variables must be added to fai.conf: monserver for faimond, and LOGSERVER to copy the logs to the server. It would be nice if these variables were added to the default fai.conf so it is obvious that they have to be defined. Even better would be if they weren't ne

ROOTCMD in cfengine script

2007-08-18 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
Is it possible to use $ROOTCMD in cfengine scripts? I update a configuration file for tex-common, and want to run update-texmf after that. It must work both for install and softupdate. This is what I tried with in my script: shellcommands: any:: ${ROOTCMD} /usr/sbin/update-texmf

Re: softupdate needs -N

2007-08-16 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
On Thu, 16 Aug 2007, Henning Glawe wrote: On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 11:12:25AM +0200, Per Foreby wrote: In previous fai versions, softupdate worked without -N after a fresh install. In 3.1.8 "fai softupdate" gives me the following error: Try to read classes from /var/log/fai/F

Re: softupdate needs -N

2007-08-15 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Emil Gorter wrote: Hi Per, On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 11:12:25 +0200 (CEST), Per Foreby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... Try to read classes from /var/log/fai/FAI_CLASSES. Failed. Aborting. I had the same in 3.1 on Ubuntu Edgy. Solved it by just copying it over in

softupdate needs -N

2007-08-15 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
Hi, posting here instead of filing a bug report since I don't know if this is a bug or me doing something wrong. In previous fai versions, softupdate worked without -N after a fresh install. In 3.1.8 "fai softupdate" gives me the following error: Try to read classes from /var/log/fai/FAI_

Faimond with timestamps

2007-08-03 Diskussionsfäden Per Foreby
Sometimes the faimond output can be confusing. This is especially true when I'm testing a new configuration, and might install the same computer many times i a row: Did the installation succeded, or am I looking at faimond output from an earlier installation? To make the output more informativ