Hi All,
I've been tasked with updating our Lenny FAI server to run on and install
Squeeze. The clients that we'll be installing to are a mix of servers, some of
which are IDE, 2 drives, to be running Raid1.
Thanks to the tireless efforts of Michael Tautschnig we've had this
configuration runni
Hi David,
Thanks a lot for your detailed description!!
[...]
>
> Whatever the issue is, I think it is has to be in the experimental 48 build
> of setup-storage. I'm just not savvy enough to figure out what the problem is
> as there are no errors logged that I can see. I have a tarball of the
Hi,
Le mardi 21 décembre 2010 à 18:50 -0800, David Dreezer a écrit :
> Our /dev/hdx drives were being identified as /dev/sd(x), confusing
> both us and setup storage. I made edits to my disk_config file to
> work around this
You could specify disks names in your disk_config as "disk1, disk2..."
Hi Mathieu,
Micheal and I had an off line exchange and ultimately that is what I've done
with the 3.3.5 setup-storage, but that did not make the issue go away when I
tried it with build 48, so I left that out of my description for that reason.
It would be one more variable that could confuse th
Hi Michael,
I can pack up logs from 3.3.5 and 40~48. Do I send them here or to you
personally?
I can give 3.4.5 a try, sure. I only went to 4.0 as it was the only version
that I was able to get SW raid working with. I'll try 3.4.5 a try today and
see what it does.
David Dreezer
Customer Ad
> Hi Michael,
>
> I can pack up logs from 3.3.5 and 40~48. Do I send them here or to you
> personally?
>
I guess it's fine if you send them via private mail. Don't know about message
size limits for this list, but most probably there's no point in bothering
anyone else.
> I can give 3.4.5 a t
> > Hi Michael,
> >
> > I can pack up logs from 3.3.5 and 40~48. Do I send them here or to you
> > personally?
> >
>
> I guess it's fine if you send them via private mail. Don't know about message
> size limits for this list, but most probably there's no point in bothering
> anyone else.
>
>
Hi Michael,
Yes, that describes the issue perfectly.
Thus, at your suggestion I made the change to my SW_RAID config in disk_config
file, which is to add in the "align-at":
disk_config disk1 align-at:32256B
This worked perfectly. The client installed and then booted, no problems.
Again, this
Hi again,
> Hi Michael,
>
> Yes, that describes the issue perfectly.
>
> Thus, at your suggestion I made the change to my SW_RAID config in
> disk_config file, which is to add in the "align-at":
>
> disk_config disk1 align-at:32256B
>
> This worked perfectly. The client installed and then bo
Oh, sure I can. It actually did work with the 3.3.5 with the disk-align. I'll
try today's 3.4.6 release, remove that part, and see what it does.
David Dreezer
Customer Advocate, Social Strata, Inc.
Online Community HQ Since 1996
Hoop.la · LiveCloud · Eve Community
Follow us: @socialstrata
Hi all,
[...]
> - setup-storage will have to take this into account more properly, but
> auto-detection will be almost impossible (it seems to be a BIOS issue),
> hence
> I'm currently favouring a align-at:cylinder variant of the "align-at"
> option.
>
JFTR: since 4.0~beta2+experimental52
11 matches
Mail list logo
