On Fri, 20. Jan. 2006 at 17:01:35 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> > (1) the classic class directory
>
> Do we need it in that kind of hierarchy or even more, does it make
> sense?
Good question, that was also my first question. ;-)
> > (3) a file which defines all packages needed for
> > that
[...]
>
> CLASSNAME/
> class_scripts/ -> (1)
> [-NAME]
> variables -> (2)
> package_config -> (3)
> disk_config (4)
> debconf (5) a debconf file for that class
> README (6)
> hooks/ (7)
>
>
> depends(8)
> scripts/ (9)
> [-NAME]
> [-NAME]
> version
>
> Henning Sprang a écrit :
>
> >Hi,
> >I put some more thoughts into the class hierarchy topic, and wrote them
> >down.
> >My Goal is to help sharing, copying and distributing single classes
> >which solve specific problems, as well as improving manageability of FAI
> >install configurations in g
