Intent to 0-day NMU FAI 3.4.1 to fix #595365

2010-09-15 Thread Julien BLACHE
Hi, I intend to prepare, test and upload an NMU of FAI 3.4.1 tomorrow to finally beat FAI into shape for Squeeze (fixing #595365). If there's any reason why I shouldn't do it, please let me know ASAP. Thanks, JB. -- Julien BLACHE | Debian, because code matters more Debian & GNU/Linux De

Re: Bug#595365: Intent to 0-day NMU FAI 3.4.1 to fix #595365

2010-09-15 Thread Thomas Lange
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:29:37 +0200, Julien BLACHE > said: > I intend to prepare, test and upload an NMU of FAI 3.4.1 tomorrow to > finally beat FAI into shape for Squeeze (fixing #595365). I see no reason why to do an NMU. Mika is on vacation until tomorrow, and he will care ab

Re: Bug#595365: Intent to 0-day NMU FAI 3.4.1 to fix #595365

2010-09-15 Thread Julien BLACHE
Thomas Lange wrote: Hi, > I see no reason why to do an NMU. Mika is on vacation until tomorrow, > and he will care about the fix after that. There's no reason to hurry. Great. Maybe my unhappiness wrt the situation of FAI for Squeeze will finally dissipate :) JB. -- Julien BLACHE | Debia

Re: Bug#595365: Intent to 0-day NMU FAI 3.4.1 to fix #595365

2010-09-15 Thread Michael Prokop
* Julien BLACHE [Wed Sep 15, 2010 at 07:26:42PM +0200]: > Thomas Lange wrote: > > I see no reason why to do an NMU. Mika is on vacation until tomorrow, > > and he will care about the fix after that. There's no reason to hurry. > Great. Maybe my unhappiness wrt the situation of FAI for Squeeze w