Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi,
> Well, setup-storage development is really driven by use cases and feature
> requests these days, so unless someone explicitly requests that, it will not
> be
> supported, right. Yet it doesn't seem to hard to implement, IMHO just add a
> few
> commands with prop
Hi!!
> Hello everyone,
>
> we have a patch for fcopy, that allows the creation of symlinks in files/ via
> trigger -H.
> It would be great (if the patch is good enough) to see this change in future
> releases.
>
Sorry for following up very late on this one; I guess it's up to Thomas to
decide
[...]
>
> Yes, that'll do :) Though I should note that preserving RAID on LVM or
> LVM on RAID is not supported by setup-storage.
>
> For that to work, setup-storage would need to start RAID arrays to
> detect LVM on RAID and start LVM VGs to detect RAID on LVM. It currently
> doesn't do this, s
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi,
>> Though pt_complete is only for physical devices, so all things
>> considered I should have a second look at this. I'll do this on monday.
>
>
> Ouch, yes, you're absolutely right. I think the following code should do it:
>
> if ($vol->{preserve}) {
> $pre_req
Hi Julien,
> Michael Tautschnig wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > absolutely fine if the fix goes in via this patch). Just one stylistic note:
> > Unless I'm missing something, the following if ... elsif ...
> >
> >> -if (&FAI::set_partition_type_on_phys_dev($d, "raid")) {
> >> + if ($vol->{preserv
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
Hi,
> absolutely fine if the fix goes in via this patch). Just one stylistic note:
> Unless I'm missing something, the following if ... elsif ...
>
>> -if (&FAI::set_partition_type_on_phys_dev($d, "raid")) {
>> +if ($vol->{preserve}) {
>> + $pre_req
Hi Julien, hi all,
> Michael Prokop wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > If Michael Tautschnig as setup-storage maintainer acknowledges the
> > patch and either you or MT applies it to svn so I can cherry-pick it
> > from there that's absolutely fine for me and I'd provide it as 3.4.3
> > release, sure.
>
> O
* Julien BLACHE [Fri Sep 17, 2010 at 12:48:11PM +0200]:
> Julien BLACHE wrote:
> > Sure. Let's get 3.4.2 in first and foremost.
ACK, should show up in testing in 9 days.
> > Though having this fix would be nice, and I don't think the RT
> > would object.
Jepp.
> Quoting the latest release up
Julien BLACHE wrote:
> Sure. Let's get 3.4.2 in first and foremost. Though having this fix
> would be nice, and I don't think the RT would object.
Quoting the latest release update:
- fixes for severity: important bugs in packages of priority: optional
or extra, only when this can be done
Michael Prokop wrote:
Hi,
> If Michael Tautschnig as setup-storage maintainer acknowledges the
> patch and either you or MT applies it to svn so I can cherry-pick it
> from there that's absolutely fine for me and I'd provide it as 3.4.3
> release, sure.
OK, let's wait for Michael's review :)
>
10 matches
Mail list logo