Johan Ekenberg writes:
> Corrupted permissions have been reported mostly with files needing
> global write permissions (www-counters writable for nobody, etc) which
> have lost their special permissions. Usually they've been "reset"
> according to the normal umask (ie. getting permissions 644). On
This is a WAG, but:
1. Did you build ext3 as a module?
2. If so, are you running on a kernel that was built before applying the
ext3 patch and configuring?
If the answers are yes, the inode cache may be too small to contain the
ext3 in-memory inode, and the ext3 code is overwriting the inode b
> > A few weeks ago we upgraded 9 large webservers from ext2 to
> ext3. Since then we've seen very strange behavior on several
> of the machines. Permissions of files are repeatedly changed
> at random occasions. Several times, ownership of files have
> been totally mangled. Several users have lo
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 11:04:20PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
>
> > Patch is for 2.4.4-ac6, but I believe that it applies to Linus
> > tree too. If it works for you, feel free to forward it to Linus
> > and/or Alan and/or Al. But you should verify also file
Hi,
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 04:56:26PM -0400, Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:29:28PM +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> > I'm not sure where to start, here --- this has never been reported
> > before and I don't know of anything in the VFS that could be so
> > specific in i
On Wed, May 09, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> Patch is for 2.4.4-ac6, but I believe that it applies to Linus
> tree too. If it works for you, feel free to forward it to Linus
> and/or Alan and/or Al. But you should verify also file creation
> before it - vfat code looks ok to me, but who knows...
I tr
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:29:28PM +0100, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> I'm not sure where to start, here --- this has never been reported
> before and I don't know of anything in the VFS that could be so
> specific in its corruption.
Well, the on-disk inode looks like:
struct ext2_inode {
Hi,
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:50:34PM +0200, Johan Ekenberg wrote:
>
> A few weeks ago we upgraded 9 large webservers from ext2 to ext3. Since then we've
>seen very strange behavior on several of the machines. Permissions of files are
>repeatedly changed at random occasions. Several times, o
Hi!
A few weeks ago we upgraded 9 large webservers from ext2 to ext3. Since then we've
seen very strange behavior on several of the machines. Permissions of files are
repeatedly changed at random occasions. Several times, ownership of files have been
totally mangled. Several users have logged
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 12:50:15PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 12:40:25PM -0500, Steve Best wrote:
>> Release 0.3.1 of JFS was made available today.
>>
>> Drop 31 on May 9, 2001 (jfs-0.3.1.tar.gz) includes fixes to the
>> file system and utilities.
>>
>> For more deta
On 9 May 01 at 18:40, Olaf Hering wrote:
>
> Now we have to ged rid of the warnings and test it on other archs.
After looking at msdos_dir_entry definition I'm surprised that it works,
it should generate unaligned trap, as src contains odd address...
> --- linux_ppc.orig/fs/fat/dir.c Tue Sep
Hi Steve,
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 12:40:25PM -0500, Steve Best wrote:
> Release 0.3.1 of JFS was made available today.
>
> Drop 31 on May 9, 2001 (jfs-0.3.1.tar.gz) includes fixes to the
> file system and utilities.
>
> For more details about the problems fixed, please see the README.
would it
Release 0.3.1 of JFS was made available today.
Drop 31 on May 9, 2001 (jfs-0.3.1.tar.gz) includes fixes to the
file system and utilities.
For more details about the problems fixed, please see the README.
Steve
JFS for Linux http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/jfs
-
To uns
On Wed, May 09, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> On 9 May 01 at 15:30, Olaf Hering wrote:
> > On Wed, May 09, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > At Wed, 9 May 2001 09:42:59 +0200,
> > > Olaf Hering wrote:
> > > > the vfat driver doesnt work properly with 2.4.2 and 2.4.5-pre1. The
> > > > directory entries appear
On 9 May 01 at 15:30, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > At Wed, 9 May 2001 09:42:59 +0200,
> > Olaf Hering wrote:
> > > the vfat driver doesnt work properly with 2.4.2 and 2.4.5-pre1. The
> > > directory entries appear as "???" when the entry is handled as
> > > un
On Wed, May 09, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Wed, 9 May 2001 09:42:59 +0200,
> Olaf Hering wrote:
> > the vfat driver doesnt work properly with 2.4.2 and 2.4.5-pre1. The
> > directory entries appear as "???" when the entry is handled as
> > unicode(?). this happens on floppy and zip disks on a P
At Wed, 9 May 2001 09:42:59 +0200,
Olaf Hering wrote:
> the vfat driver doesnt work properly with 2.4.2 and 2.4.5-pre1. The
> directory entries appear as "???" when the entry is handled as
> unicode(?). this happens on floppy and zip disks on a PowerMac.
>
> I have one floppy with the filenam
On Wed, May 09, Olaf Hering wrote:
> the vfat driver doesnt work properly with 2.4.2 and 2.4.5-pre1. The
> directory entries appear as "???" when the entry is handled as
> unicode(?). this happens on floppy and zip disks on a PowerMac.
>
> I have one floppy with the filename "urmel.arj". The
Hi,
the vfat driver doesnt work properly with 2.4.2 and 2.4.5-pre1. The
directory entries appear as "???" when the entry is handled as
unicode(?). this happens on floppy and zip disks on a PowerMac.
I have one floppy with the filename "urmel.arj". The disk was formated
on Win98. The director
19 matches
Mail list logo
