On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 04:55:49PM -0600, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
...
> diff -Nurp linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/fs/jfs/jfs_lock.h linux/fs/jfs/jfs_lock.h
> --- linux-2.6.20-rc4-mm1/fs/jfs/jfs_lock.h2006-11-29 15:57:37.0
> -0600
> +++ linux/fs/jfs/jfs_lock.h 2007-01-17 15:30:19.0 -0600
>
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 10:46 +1100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 17 2007, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 10:18 +1100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >
> > > Can you try io_schedule() and verify that things just work?
> >
> > I actually did do that in the first place, but wondered if it was t
On Wed, Jan 17 2007, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> Jens,
> Can you please take a look at this patch, and if you think it's sane,
> add it to your explicit i/o plugging patchset? Would it make sense in
> any of these paths to use io_schedule() instead of schedule()?
I'm glad you bring that up, actually.
On Wed, Jan 17 2007, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 10:18 +1100, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> > Can you try io_schedule() and verify that things just work?
>
> I actually did do that in the first place, but wondered if it was the
> right thing to introduce the accounting changes that came
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 10:18 +1100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Can you try io_schedule() and verify that things just work?
I actually did do that in the first place, but wondered if it was the
right thing to introduce the accounting changes that came with that.
I'll change it back to io_schedule() and te
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 08:25:15PM -0800, Nate Diller wrote:
the right thing to do from a design perspective. Hopefully it enables
a new architecture that can reduce context switches in I/O completion,
and reduce overhead. That's the real motive ;)
Jens,
Can you please take a look at this patch, and if you think it's sane,
add it to your explicit i/o plugging patchset? Would it make sense in
any of these paths to use io_schedule() instead of schedule()?
I hadn't looked at your patchset until I discovered that jfs was easy to
hang in the -mm
On Mon, Jan 15, 2007 at 08:25:15PM -0800, Nate Diller wrote:
> the right thing to do from a design perspective. Hopefully it enables
> a new architecture that can reduce context switches in I/O completion,
> and reduce overhead. That's the real motive ;)
And it's a broken motive. Context switch
Hello,
some time ago I sent some open advisory there, but in fact it had been
already fixed. So I want to continue in this chase on open advisories
and closed bugs. So there is some from FS:
CVE-2006-2629 - Race condition in Linux kernel 2.6.15 to 2.6.17, when
running on SMP platforms, allows loca
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 07:21:42PM +0530, Suparna Bhattacharya ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> Since you are implementing new APIs here, have you considered doing an
> aio_sendfilev to be able to send a header with the data ?
It is doable, but why people do not like corking?
With Linux less than
Since you are implementing new APIs here, have you considered doing an
aio_sendfilev to be able to send a header with the data ?
Regards
Suparna
On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 09:30:35AM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:
>
> Kevent based AIO (aio_sendfile()/aio_sendfile_path()).
>
> aio_sendfile()/aio_s
Hi,
On Jan 16, 2007 21:03 +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Add new ioctl(EXT4_IOC_DEFRAG) which returns the first physical
block number of the specified file. With this ioctl, a command
gets the specified directory's.
Maybe I don't understand, but how is this different from the long
12 matches
Mail list logo
