On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 12:30:55AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
The gfs2 implementation in the last patch is (unfortunately) still just
a rough draft that needs some more thought and some testing.
So what exactly in this patch is tested?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 12:33:59AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
+ */
+int vfs_lock_file(struct file *filp, unsigned int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
+{
+ if (filp-f_op filp-f_op-lock)
+ return filp-f_op-lock(filp, cmd, fl);
+ else
+ return
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 03:52:32PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Bugfixes come first, so I will drop readahead and fsaio and git-block to get
this work completed if needed - please work agaisnt mainline.
OK with readahead.
There are too much fixes in the series. I'd like to fold them up and
On Sat, 3 February 2007 02:33:16 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
If doing a partial-write, simply clear the whole page and set it uptodate
(don't need to get too tricky).
That sounds just like a bug I recently fixed in logfs. prepare_write()
would clear the page, commit_write() would write the
On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 00:34 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
From: Marc Eshel [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unquoted
Add code to handle file system callback when the lock is finally granted.
Signed-off-by: Marc Eshel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 08:39:29AM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 12:30:55AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
The gfs2 implementation in the last patch is (unfortunately) still just
a rough draft that needs some more thought and some testing.
So what exactly in this
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 08:50:25AM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
+int vfs_test_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl, struct
file_lock *conf)
Please make sure to add linebreaks after at most 80 characters.
OK, done.
+ error = vfs_test_lock(filp, file_lock, cfl);
+ if
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 04:32:05PM -0800, Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 00:33 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
From: J. Bruce Fields [EMAIL PROTECTED] - unquoted
+int vfs_test_lock(struct file *filp, struct file_lock *fl, struct
file_lock *conf)
+{
+ int error;
+
+
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 08:54:50AM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Is there any reason we want to have both variants? I think vfs_lock_file
should simple get the last argument and we shouldn't have a separate
vfs_lock_file_conf (which btw doesn't have an exactly descriptive name).
The also
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 04:40:05PM -0800, Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 00:34 -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
nlmsvc_notify_blocked(struct file_lock *fl, struct file_lock *conf, int
result)
{
struct nlm_block*block;
+ int rc = -ENOENT;
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 05:49:47PM +, Jörn Engel wrote:
On Sat, 3 February 2007 02:33:16 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
If doing a partial-write, simply clear the whole page and set it uptodate
(don't need to get too tricky).
That sounds just like a bug I recently fixed in logfs.
11 matches
Mail list logo