On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 14:46 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> --- Eric Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Adds security_get_sb_mnt_opts, security_set_sb_mnt_opts, and
> > security_clont_sb_mnt_opts to the LSM and to SELinux. This will allow
> > filesystems to directly own and control all of th
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 09:51:48PM +0100, Andi Drebes wrote:
Hi!
I would suggest you to use squashfs instead of cramfs.
First, it's newer, it's better, it's actively developed, it doesn't have any
limits like the bad cramfs.
I'm developing a new linux based firmware f
--- Eric Paris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adds security_get_sb_mnt_opts, security_set_sb_mnt_opts, and
> security_clont_sb_mnt_opts to the LSM and to SELinux. This will allow
> filesystems to directly own and control all of their mount options if
> they so choose.
I understand why you would w
Adds security_get_sb_mnt_opts, security_set_sb_mnt_opts, and
security_clont_sb_mnt_opts to the LSM and to SELinux. This will allow
filesystems to directly own and control all of their mount options if
they so choose. This interface deals only with option identifiers and
strings so it should gener