On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:10:52 +0100 Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> The second util-linux-ng 2.13.1 release candidate is available at
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux-ng/
>
Interesting. Thanks. Which distros are using this, or plan to do so?
-
To unsubscribe
Andrew Morton schrieb:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:10:52 +0100 Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The second util-linux-ng 2.13.1 release candidate is available at
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux-ng/
Interesting. Thanks. Which distros are using this, or plan to do so?
Clemens Koller, le Sat 05 Jan 2008 15:51:57 +0100, a écrit :
> Andrew Morton schrieb:
> >On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:10:52 +0100 Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> The second util-linux-ng 2.13.1 release candidate is available at
> >>
> >>ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linu
On Saturday 05 January 2008, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Clemens Koller, le Sat 05 Jan 2008 15:51:57 +0100, a écrit :
> > Andrew Morton schrieb:
> > >On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:10:52 +0100 Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> The second util-linux-ng 2.13.1 release candidate is available at
> > >>
>
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:10:52 +0100 Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>
>> The second util-linux-ng 2.13.1 release candidate is available at
>>
>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux-ng/
>>
>
> Interesting. Thanks. Which distros are using this, or pla
On Jan 5 2008 01:31, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> The second util-linux-ng 2.13.1 release candidate is available at
>>
>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux-ng/
>>
>
>Interesting. Thanks. Which distros are using this, or plan to do so?
SUSE does. Practically, the first util-linux
> > actually doing most of what you've just suggested here, which i take to be
> > a good sign.
>
> As long as it's great minds thinking alike and not fools seldom
> differing ;-)
ooh, good phrase, one with which i wasn't familiar :)
> > most of my refactoring came out of trying
Saturday 05 January 2008 11:31:21 tarihinde şunları yazmıştınız:
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:10:52 +0100 Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The second util-linux-ng 2.13.1 release candidate is available at
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux-ng/
>
> Interesting. Thanks.
On Sat, 5 Jan 2008 01:31:21 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:10:52 +0100 Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > The second util-linux-ng 2.13.1 release candidate is available at
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux-ng/
>
Hello,
On Jan 5, 2008 10:31 AM, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2008 22:10:52 +0100 Karel Zak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The second util-linux-ng 2.13.1 release candidate is available at
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/util-linux-ng/
> >
>
> Interesti
Hello.
Changes from previous posting:
(1) Added kernel config so that users can choose
whether to compile this filesystem or not.
I didn't receive any ACK/NACK regarding whether I'm permitted to
implement this filesystem as an extension to tmpfs or not.
So, I continued imple
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 03:20:00PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Changes from previous posting:
>
> (1) Added kernel config so that users can choose
> whether to compile this filesystem or not.
>
> I didn't receive any ACK/NACK regarding whether I'm permitted to
>
Hello.
Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Your patch is very confusing. In your description, as well as in the
> comments you talk about tmpfs, but your patch does not touch even one
> line of tmpfs and only changes ramfs. Even your variables and arguments
> refer to tmpfs. The Kconfig entry indicates that th
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 04:36:06PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > Your patch is very confusing. In your description, as well as in the
> > comments you talk about tmpfs, but your patch does not touch even one
> > line of tmpfs and only changes ramfs. Even your var
14 matches
Mail list logo
