Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Pekka Enberg wrote:
[...]
> > Would you please be so kind to define your criteria for things that
> > "need fixing" so we could see if can reach some sort of an agreement on
> > this. My list is roughly as follows:
> >
> > - Errone
Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2005 at 09:21:42PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > Hmm. So we disagree on that issue as well. I think the point of review
> > is to improve code and help others conform with the existing coding
> > style which is why I find it strange that
Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Monday 28 May 2001 03:26, Horst von Brand wrote:
> > Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > On Sunday 27 May 2001 15:32, Edgar Toernig wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > > you
