[PATCH 2/2] FIEMAP ioctl for ext4

2007-11-12 Thread Kalpak Shah
was posted earlier by Andreas Dilger and can be found at: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03944.html Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: linux-2.6.23.1/fs/ext4/ioctl.c

[PATCH 1/2] Add FIEMAP header file

2007-11-12 Thread Kalpak Shah
Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: linux-2.6.23.1/include/linux/fiemap.h === --- /dev/null +++ linux-2.6.23.1/include/linux/fiemap.h @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +/* + * include/linux/fiemap.h

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-17 Thread Kalpak Shah
On Mon, 2007-07-16 at 17:49 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +static inline __le32 ext4_encode_extra_time(struct timespec *time) +{ + return

Re: [EXT4 set 7][PATCH 1/1]Remove 32000 subdirs limit.

2007-07-17 Thread Kalpak Shah
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 09:53 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:00:48 +0530 Kalpak Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - if (inode-i_nlink = EXT4_LINK_MAX) + if (EXT4_DIR_LINK_MAX(inode)) return -EMLINK; argh

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-13 Thread Kalpak Shah
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 09:59 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: Kalpak Shah wrote: On Tue, 2007-07-10 at 16:30 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:36:56 -0400 Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This patch is a spinoff of the old nanosecond patches. I don't know what

Re: [EXT4 set 7][PATCH 1/1]Remove 32000 subdirs limit.

2007-07-13 Thread Kalpak Shah
EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_DIR_NLINK if there are no longer any directory with 65000 subdirs. Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- fs/ext4/namei.c | 52 +++- include/linux/ext4_fs.h |4 ++- 2

Re: [EXT4 set 5][PATCH 1/1] expand inode i_extra_isize to support features in larger inode

2007-07-12 Thread Kalpak Shah
expansion of inodes. expand_extra_isize option will also be added to e2fsck which will expand all the inodes and if for any reason expansion fails for any inode then the EXT4_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_EXTRA_ISIZE feature will be reset. Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Kalpak

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-12 Thread Kalpak Shah
inode fields is critical for correct filesystem operation. Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Kalpak Shah [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index

Re: [EXT4 set 5][PATCH 1/1] expand inode i_extra_isize to support features in larger inode

2007-07-11 Thread Kalpak Shah
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 10:34 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:10:56 -0600 Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jul 10, 2007 16:32 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: err = ext4_reserve_inode_write(handle, inode, iloc); + if (EXT4_I(inode)-i_extra_isize

Re: [EXT4 set 3][PATCH 1/1] ext4 nanosecond timestamp

2007-07-03 Thread Kalpak Shah
On Sun, 2007-07-01 at 03:36 -0400, Mingming Cao wrote: + +#define EXT4_INODE_GET_XTIME(xtime, inode, raw_inode) \ +do {\ + (inode)-xtime.tv_sec = le32_to_cpu((raw_inode)-xtime);

Re: Testing framework

2007-04-23 Thread Kalpak Shah
On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 02:16 +0530, Karuna sagar K wrote: Hi, For some time I had been working on this file system test framework. Now I have a implementation for the same and below is the explanation. Any comments are welcome. Introduction: The testing tools and benchmarks available