On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 08:25:11PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
> Sonny Rao wrote: {
> > > >On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 07:53:09AM +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
> > > >>What I found were 4 things in the dest dir:
> > > >>1. Missing Dirs,Files. That's OK.
> &
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 11:46:27AM -0700, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 12:30:20PM -0400, Bryan Henderson wrote:
>
> > For another point of reference - were these ATA (personal class) or
> > SCSI (commercial class) drives or both?
>
> IDE were Maxtor some old Maxtor 60GB disks a
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 05:05:11PM +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote: {
> On Fri, Jul 01 2005, David Masover wrote:
> > Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> > >On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 07:53:09AM +0300, Al Boldi wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>What I found were 4 things in the dest dir:
> > >>1. Missing Dirs,Fi
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 06:17:52PM -0800, Max wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've discovered that it is possible to create files of size much larger
> than partition size.
> I thought that this is JFS bug, so I've filed a bugreport against it at
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4345
> Detailed
On Fri, Feb 25, 2005 at 08:34:39PM -0800, Frederik Eaton wrote:
> Does JFS have problems with files with special characters in them?
>
> $ ls
> ls: 04-The_Dark_Of_The_Matin?e.ogg: No such file or directory
> [1]$ rm 04-The_Dark_Of_The_Matin\?e.ogg
> rm: cannot lstat `04-The_Dark_Of_The_Matin?e.ogg
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 03:02:56PM -0500, Sonny Rao wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 04:09:46PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 15:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 04:09:46PM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 15:58, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Badari Pulavarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Due to lack of interesting suggestions to solve
> > > mpage_writepages() -> ext3_writeback_writepage() problem,
> > > I
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 11:30:16AM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> Hi,,
>
> I am trying to understand interactions between filesystem pagecache
> pages & bufferhead associated with them.
>
> I was wondering if someone could help me clarify this..
>
> I see that as part of bufferheads to page a
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 12:30:23PM -0800, Bryan Henderson wrote:
> >Its possible that by doing larger
> >IOs we save CPU and use that CPU to push more data ?
>
> This is absolutely right; my mistake -- the relevant number is CPU seconds
> per megabyte moved, not CPU seconds per elapsed second.
>
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:39:05AM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 08:37, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 16:18, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> >
> > > I am trying to understand journaling code in ext3.
> > > Can some one enlighten me, why we nee
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 09:51:42AM -0800, Bryan Henderson wrote:
> >I am inferring this using iostat which shows that average device
> >utilization fluctuates between 83 and 99 percent and the average
> >request size is around 650 sectors (going to the device) without
> >writepages.
> >
> >With wr
On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 09:05:21PM -0500, Bryan Henderson wrote:
> >I see much larger IO chunks and better throughput. So, I guess its
> >worth doing it
>
> I hate to see something like this go ahead based on empirical results
> without theory. It might make things worse somewhere else.
>
> Do
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 12:38:08AM -0500, Sonny Rao wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 06:33:51PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> > On Feb 03, 2005 15:50 -0500, Sonny Rao wrote:
> > > Well, from what I can tell, my patch doesn't seem to make much of a
> > > differenc
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 06:33:51PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Feb 03, 2005 15:50 -0500, Sonny Rao wrote:
> > Well, from what I can tell, my patch doesn't seem to make much of a
> > difference in write throughput other than allowing multi-page bios to
> > be sen
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 07:51:37AM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 12:19, Sonny Rao wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 07:32:04AM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I forgot the reason why we don't have ext3_write
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:56:50AM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-02-03 at 09:00, Sonny Rao wrote:
>
> >
> > Well it seems to work, here's my (rather ugly) patch.
> > I'm doing some performance comparisons now.
> >
> >
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 08:37:19AM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> I was wondering why mpage_writepage() is only "static" ?
>
> Is the expectation that, filesystems use
>
> .writepage == block_full_write_page
> .writepages == mpage_writepages
>
> ? I am little confu
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 07:51:37AM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-02 at 12:19, Sonny Rao wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 07:32:04AM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I forgot the reason why we don't have ext3_write
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 07:32:04AM -0800, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I forgot the reason why we don't have ext3_writepages() ?
> I can dig through to find out, but it would be easy to ask
> people.
>
> Please let me know.
Badari, I seem to have successfully hacked the writeback mode to us
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 05:32:31PM -0800, Bryan Henderson wrote:
> Thanks for the numbers, though there are enough variables here that it's
> hard to make any hard conclusions.
I agree, I just throught the data was interesting.
> When I've seen these comparisons in the past, it turned out to b
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 03:46:15PM -0800, Bryan Henderson wrote:
> To get multi-page bios (in any natural way), you need to throw out not
> only the generic file read/write routines, but the page cache as well.
>
> Every time I've looked at multi-page bios, I've been unable to see any
> reason
21 matches
Mail list logo
