On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 03:24:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> -repeat:
> - if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&mnt->mnt_count, &vfsmount_lock)) {
> + while (atomic_dec_and_lock(&mnt->mnt_count, &vfsmount_lock)) {
> if (likely(!mnt->mnt_pinned)) {
> spin_unlock(&v
Andrew Morton пишет:
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:49:19 +0300
> Dmitri Vorobiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Zach Brown пишет:
> This doesn't look fine. Did you test this?
Oops, my fault. Of course, I tested the patch, but kernel modules are
disabled in my test setup, so I missed the
On Thu, 22 Nov 2007 01:49:19 +0300
Dmitri Vorobiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zach Brown пишет:
> >>> This doesn't look fine. Did you test this?
> >> Oops, my fault. Of course, I tested the patch, but kernel modules are
> >> disabled in my test setup, so I missed the error.
> >
> > :)
> >
> >
Zach Brown пишет:
>>> This doesn't look fine. Did you test this?
>> Oops, my fault. Of course, I tested the patch, but kernel modules are
>> disabled in my test setup, so I missed the error.
>
> :)
>
>> Enclosed to this message is a new patch, which replaces the goto-loop by
>> the while-based o
