On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 11:23:05PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 05:36:42AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:13:29PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
Are we going to get rid of the file and intr arguments btw? I'm not sure
intr is useful, and mapping is
Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Index: linux-2.6/fs/splice.c
===
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/splice.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/splice.c
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static int pipe_to_file(struct pipe_inod
struct address_space *mapping =
Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Index: linux-2.6/fs/splice.c
===
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/splice.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/splice.c
@@ -559,7 +559,7 @@ static int pipe_to_file(struct pipe_inod
struct
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 05:36 +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:13:29PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
[some comments snipped]
Attached is a quick patch to hook up the existing ocfs2 write code. This has
been compile tested only for now - one of my test machines isn't
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 21:13 -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
Hi Nick,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 02:38:22PM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
Introduce write_begin, write_end, and perform_write aops.
These are intended to replace prepare_write and commit_write with more
flexible alternatives that are
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 04:06:39PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
Hell no! Struct file carries information that is essential for those of
us that use strong authentication. It stays.
Joel pointed this out yesterday for the nfs case. Not to worry, we'll keep
struct file around :)
--Mark
Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Introduce write_begin, write_end, and perform_write aops.
These are intended to replace prepare_write and commit_write with more
flexible alternatives that are also able to avoid the buffered write
deadlock problems efficiently (which prepare_write is
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:28:04AM +0300, Dmitriy Monakhov wrote:
Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+
+int pagecache_write_end(struct file *file, struct address_space *mapping,
+ loff_t pos, unsigned len, unsigned copied,
+ struct
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 10:46:25PM +0100, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote:
Hello,
I guess no need to define 'ret' twice here.
[...]
Hi Mariusz,
Thanks, I'll clean that up.
Nick
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-fsdevel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
Hi Nick,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 02:38:22PM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
Introduce write_begin, write_end, and perform_write aops.
These are intended to replace prepare_write and commit_write with more
flexible alternatives that are also able to avoid the buffered write
deadlock problems
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:13:29PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
Hi Nick,
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 02:38:22PM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
Introduce write_begin, write_end, and perform_write aops.
These are intended to replace prepare_write and commit_write with more
flexible alternatives
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 05:36:42AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
Are we going to get rid of the file and intr arguments btw? I'm not sure
intr is useful, and mapping is probably enough to get whatever we inside
-write_begin / -write_end.
Yeah, I was going to, but I had this version ready to
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 05:36:42AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 09:13:29PM -0700, Mark Fasheh wrote:
Are we going to get rid of the file and intr arguments btw? I'm not sure
intr is useful, and mapping is probably enough to get whatever we inside
-write_begin /
13 matches
Mail list logo
