> Currently all options suck equally. I'm not advocating /proc for the data
> (that'd be silly) but I am against a wholesale change from one dump to
> another in the name of being "pretty" wit a more significant fix.
It should be a misc device too obviously.
Your 68K of devfs does actually get
> "Eric" == Eric W Biederman writes:
Eric> Jes Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I second that - I always had the impression that if devfs ever
>> went into the official kernel it was going to be as an option,
>> leaving system functional without enabling it.
Eric> I never saw an arg
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
>On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, George wrote:
>> The alternative to devfs is what we already have, a working (maybe not
>> perfect, but working) /dev. And if you already have /dev (and use it),
>> what's the point of wasting memory on devfs which would duplicate
