Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Dynamic Modify the timeout values

2007-06-22 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
Hi Horms, On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:36:02PM +0900, Horms wrote: [snip] Also, I'm not a big fan of declaring variables other inside blocks, but I'm not sure what the linux-ha guidelines on this are. Often, I find it preferable. If the function is long,* tracing a variable which has nothing to

AW: [Linux-ha-dev] Hb-2.0.9/SuSE: memory leak in crmd/lrmd undersolaris 10/i386

2007-06-22 Thread Otte, Joerg
are these the only two processes growing? There are other (smaller) increments as well. Here is the complete list: RSS VSZRSS VSZ 1708 4496 1708 4496 /usr/sfw/lib/python2.3/heartbeat/ha_logd 1316 4396 1316 4396 /usr/sfw/lib/python2.3/heartbeat/ha_logd 9204 12788 9204 12788

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Hb-2.0.9/SuSE: memory leak in crmd/lrmd undersolaris 10/i386

2007-06-22 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 6/22/07, Otte, Joerg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: are these the only two processes growing? There are other (smaller) increments as well. Here is the complete list: RSS VSZRSS VSZ 1708 4496 1708 4496 /usr/sfw/lib/python2.3/heartbeat/ha_logd 1316 4396 1316 4396

Re: AW: [Linux-ha-dev] Hb-2.0.9/SuSE: memory leak in crmd/lrmd undersolaris 10/i386

2007-06-22 Thread David Lee
On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, Otte, Joerg wrote: [...] are there any tools on solaris to show where the leaks are coming from? (on linux we have valgrind, support for which is easily enabled in heartbeat) I don't know of any tool which comes for free. Joerg: I've just done a quick Google search

AW: [Linux-ha-dev] Hb-2.0.9/SuSE: memory leak in crmd/lrmdundersolaris 10/i386

2007-06-22 Thread Otte, Joerg
one more question... was the cluster very active during that time? ie. moving resources around? Yes, the resource group (and contained 7 resources) were moved once per Minute - (to see if this works was the primary goal of the testcase). -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Hb-2.0.9/SuSE: memory leak in crmd/lrmdundersolaris 10/i386

2007-06-22 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 6/22/07, Otte, Joerg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: one more question... was the cluster very active during that time? ie. moving resources around? Yes, the resource group (and contained 7 resources) were moved once per Minute - (to see if this works was the primary goal of the testcase). ok -

[Linux-ha-dev] Filesystem not umounted because fuser does not see unix domain sockets

2007-06-22 Thread Lars Ellenberg
Hi there, just to make you all aware of it. sometimes Filesystem stop cannot umount the file system, and fuser does not kill anybody. and this time it it not NFS, for a change. fuser misses unix domain sockets! this is a long known issue, but it just recently hit me again during a failover, so

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Filesystem not umounted because fuser does not see unix domain sockets

2007-06-22 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2007-06-22T14:33:34, Lars Ellenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so we may want to complement the $FUSER -a -k -v -m with something like lsof -U | awk '/ \/'$mountpoint'\// { print $2 }' | xargs -- kill comments? Clearly correct. Thanks for pointing that out, and I've got to admit I missed

Re: [Linux-ha-dev] Filesystem not umounted because fuser does not see unix domain sockets

2007-06-22 Thread Lars Ellenberg
On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 05:32:32PM +0200, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: On 2007-06-22T14:33:34, Lars Ellenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so we may want to complement the $FUSER -a -k -v -m with something like lsof -U | awk '/ \/'$mountpoint'\// { print $2 }' | xargs -- kill comments?

Re: [Linux-HA] Question about bug submissions

2007-06-22 Thread Andrew Beekhof
On 6/21/07, Madison Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Beekhof wrote: Its a regular debian repository so you should just be able to run apt-update against it to see any new package. (alas that feature was broken yesterday but i was told it would be fixed by today - if its not please do

Re: [Linux-HA] DRBD problem

2007-06-22 Thread Madison Kelly
I forgot to include my 'drbd.conf' file (comments stripped): -=-=-] /etc/drbd.conf [-=-=- global { usage-count yes; } common { syncer { rate 10M; } } resource r0 { protocol C; handlers { pri-on-incon-degr echo O /proc/sysrq-trigger ;

Re: [Linux-HA] Version 2.0.8

2007-06-22 Thread Lars Marowsky-Bree
On 2007-06-22T17:33:39, Ben Clewett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Linux-ha, I have had terrible results from running V2.0.8 using the GUI. Well, as frequently mentioned, the upstream 2.0.8 is a bit dated. However, your list of issues is fairly long. Quick inspection indicates that some

Re: [Linux-HA] DRBD problem

2007-06-22 Thread Andreas Kurz
Hello Madison, Your drbd configuration seems to work fine, but keep in mind that you can only mount a drbd device that is in prmary state. So you have to umount the filesystem on the master, switch drbd devices to secondary mode and switch to primary mode on the slave ... but that can make

Re: [Linux-HA] DRBD problem

2007-06-22 Thread Madison Kelly
Andreas Kurz wrote: Hello Madison, Your drbd configuration seems to work fine, but keep in mind that you can only mount a drbd device that is in prmary state. So you have to umount the filesystem on the master, switch drbd devices to secondary mode and switch to primary mode on the slave ...