Hi,
I found that this error wouldn't occur with the latest version.
When I tried the same operation with dev version, changeset:5bb25d3ce208,
there wasn't segmentation fault!
I attached the output of gdb with v2.0.8 just for your information.
Thanks,
Junko
> -Original Message-
> From: [E
I am trying to get the drbd device promoted to master when the r_dummy
resource is started, but I'm having a bit of trouble and I expect that its
something simple. What I've got os far is following the wiki as best that
I can. The relavent section of the CIB is below, along with the logs fr
> On 6/27/07, Junko IKEDA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I encountered a segmentation fault when I tried cibadmin like this;
> >
> > cibadmin -U -o resources -X
> >' > type="Dummy" provider="heartbeat"
> > resource_stickiness="0">
> >
> > actually, it's my miss. I had to
2007/6/27, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 2007-06-27T01:53:20, Ciro Iriarte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, i have a basic heartbeat2 cluster running (the only resource is a
> floating ip address) and drbd-0.7.14 running on it's own on SLES9SP3.
> Anybody has a procedure to tie them
2007/6/27, Lars Marowsky-Bree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 2007-06-27T01:53:20, Ciro Iriarte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, i have a basic heartbeat2 cluster running (the only resource is a
> floating ip address) and drbd-0.7.14 running on it's own on SLES9SP3.
> Anybody has a procedure to tie them
2007/6/27, Madison Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Ciro Iriarte wrote:
> Hi, i have a basic heartbeat2 cluster running (the only resource is a
> floating ip address) and drbd-0.7.14 running on it's own on SLES9SP3.
> Anybody has a procedure to tie them up?, i'm kind of lost even with
> hb_gui (i'm not
Thanks to the openSUSE build service, I'm pleased to announce that we
now finally have daily builds, directly pulled from
http://hg.linux-ha.org/dev available at
http://build.opensuse.org/package/show?package=heartbeat&project=home%3ALarsMB
The Debian packages have a minor issue right now causing
>>> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 9:51 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:37:37PM +0200, FG wrote:
>> Hi all,
[...]
> Yes, you should use STONITH.
>
>> Or perhaps somebody knows that a SAN DS4000 can
>> give access to the
>
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 04:06:31PM +0200, pigna wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have configured 2 firewall on cluster with heartbeat.
>
> This i configuration file:
>
> debugfile /var/log/ha-debug
> logfile /var/log/ha-log
> logfacility local0
> debug 1
> keepalive 10
> warntime 15
> deadtim
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:37:37PM +0200, FG wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I need some advices about my configuration for
> high-availability.
> I would like to set up an active/passive
> configuration for our POP/IMAP
> server.
>
> We have two servers with each one two HBA cards
> (FC) attached to a S
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
> On 2007-06-26T14:10:16, Madison Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Madison Kelly wrote:
> > >Filesystem[3233]: 2007/06/25_16:20:07 ERROR: Setup problem:
> > >Couldn't find utility fsck
> >
> > I finally figured this out... Turns out the
I am currently running 2.0.8 and have had no issues. However, I use the old config style
(haresources configuration file), not the new CRM style (CIB.XML I believe is the name).
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Connections]# rpm -qa | grep heart
heartbeat-2.0.8-2
heartbeat-pils-2.0.8-2
heartbeat-stonith-2.0.8-
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2007-06-27T09:14:39, Madison Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
# Change the '/dev/drbd0', '/ha' and 'ext3' to match your setup.
# Edit the '/etc/fstab' file on either machine:
#
/dev/drbd0 /ha ext3defaults,noauto 0 0
That s
On 2007-06-26T14:10:16, Madison Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Madison Kelly wrote:
> >Filesystem[3233]: 2007/06/25_16:20:07 ERROR: Setup problem:
> >Couldn't find utility fsck
>
> I finally figured this out... Turns out the file:
> /usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/Filesystem had t
On 2007-05-10T17:11:40, Ben Clewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While fishing for drbd issues I should document, I came across this
slightly outdated mail ... Sorry for the "delay" ;-)
> I have DRBD (8.0.2) installed. This works perfectly from the command
> line. The '/etc/ha.d/resource.d/drbdd
On 2007-06-27T13:37:59, Peter Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >later versions do not seem to contain that message anymore
> That means it's nothing to worry about? Even in the latest (released)
> version (which me thinks is 2.0.8)? I can continue to ignore it
> then?
I'd very strongly su
On 2007-06-27T09:14:39, Madison Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # Change the '/dev/drbd0', '/ha' and 'ext3' to match your setup.
> # Edit the '/etc/fstab' file on either machine:
> #
> /dev/drbd0/ha ext3defaults,noauto 0 0
>
> That should do it!
The f
On 2007-06-27T01:53:20, Ciro Iriarte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, i have a basic heartbeat2 cluster running (the only resource is a
> floating ip address) and drbd-0.7.14 running on it's own on SLES9SP3.
> Anybody has a procedure to tie them up?, i'm kind of lost even with
> hb_gui (i'm not su
On 2007-06-27T01:53:20, Ciro Iriarte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi, i have a basic heartbeat2 cluster running (the only resource is a
> floating ip address) and drbd-0.7.14 running on it's own on SLES9SP3.
> Anybody has a procedure to tie them up?, i'm kind of lost even with
> hb_gui (i'm not su
Running heartbeat 2.0.7 as provided by Debian 4.0 official packages.
Two nodes (cmphoto2 and cmphoto3), running heartbeat in the 'old
haresource' mode rather than with crm, as I couldn't get my head
wrapped around the whole XML configuration.
My haresource file only has one uncommented line:
cm
Hello,
I haven't been following the list religiously the last few weeks, so please
excuse
me if this question has been answered.
I'm wondering if people have installed heartbeat on (RedHat Enterprise Linux)
RHEL
AS4u5 (64-bit), and if so, specifically which version of HB is recommended? The
ma
Yan Fitterer wrote:
All the other apps where referenced by their full /path/to/executable.
Why wasn't FSCK? Secondly, without a path shouldn't it have looked in
$PATH or is $PATH blank for the user that Filesystem runs as? If the
later is the case, why would 'fsck' work then? Is this worthy of
Ciro Iriarte wrote:
Hi, i have a basic heartbeat2 cluster running (the only resource is a
floating ip address) and drbd-0.7.14 running on it's own on SLES9SP3.
Anybody has a procedure to tie them up?, i'm kind of lost even with
hb_gui (i'm not sure about Master/Slave ID for example).
I can live
no_quorum_policy="ignore" achieves that, as you said yourself. What it
doesn't achieve, is safety for shared data. Hence STONITH.
If you want to run without quorum -> no_quorum_policy (this is really a
split-brain prevention setting...)
If you want security for shared data -> STONITH.
Pick and ch
You are absolutely right about the role of STONITH in all this. But: this
doesn't change the fact that my services are stopped if the number of nodes
that remains is below the quorum that is designed. I would really like to
see that even if just one node remains, my services keep running anyway.
STONITH.
Second node fails: 3rd node takes over resources, but only after
verified power off (or restart) of 2nd node.
Actually - same thing for 1st node.
Challenge: Ensure that you don't lost network AND stonith at the same time.
Yan
Sander van Vugt wrote:
> Hi list,
>
>
>
> Trying to thi
On 6/27/07, Junko IKEDA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I encountered a segmentation fault when I tried cibadmin like this;
cibadmin -U -o resources -X
'
actually, it's my miss. I had to close the tag.
Correct usage is here, right?
cibadmin -U -o resources -X
'
I think it's more helpful
Hi list,
Trying to think out a decent solution here, I run across the following. I
want to build a three node cluster where some services are running. Now the
following situation arises: I bring down one node for maintenance. Shortly
after that a second node fails. This causes the cluster to lo
Hi,
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
later versions do not seem to contain that message anymore
That means it's nothing to worry about? Even in the latest (released)
version (which me thinks is 2.0.8)? I can continue to ignore it
then?
Peter
___
Hi all,
I need some advices about my configuration for
high-availability.
I would like to set up an active/passive
configuration for our POP/IMAP
server.
We have two servers with each one two HBA cards
(FC) attached to a SAN
IBM DS4000 where we store the mailbox.
My concern:
In case of a f
> All the other apps where referenced by their full /path/to/executable.
> Why wasn't FSCK? Secondly, without a path shouldn't it have looked in
> $PATH or is $PATH blank for the user that Filesystem runs as? If the
> later is the case, why would 'fsck' work then? Is this worthy of a bug
> being
Hi,
I encountered a segmentation fault when I tried cibadmin like this;
cibadmin -U -o resources -X
'
actually, it's my miss. I had to close the tag.
Correct usage is here, right?
cibadmin -U -o resources -X
'
I think it's more helpful if there are some usages instead of a segmentation
32 matches
Mail list logo
