David Erickson wrote:
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2007-06-30T14:46:35, David Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
should tell you which RAs the LRM finds on the filesystem. The LRM, in
turn, looks at OCF_RA_DIR (which is set at compile time), and is based
on OCF_ROOT_DIR. If that isn't overr
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2007-06-30T14:46:35, David Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
should tell you which RAs the LRM finds on the filesystem. The LRM, in
turn, looks at OCF_RA_DIR (which is set at compile time), and is based
on OCF_ROOT_DIR. If that isn't overridden in the centos sp
Sorry...
I will confirm the problem again in a new package tomorrow.
It registers if afterwards, there is a problem.
Therefore, it has not registered in bugzilla yet.
Regard,
Yamauchi.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lars
> Marowsky-B
Hi
> It's an on-going discussion between Andrew and myself whether start
> failures should not simply increase the failcount by a configurable
> amount as well - if this defaulted to INFINITY, the current behaviour
> would still apply, but finer granularity would also be possible.
It has understo
Hi
I will confirm the problem again in a new package tomorrow.
It registers if afterwards, there is a problem.
Therefore, it has not registered in bugzilla yet.
Regard,
Yamauchi.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lars
> Marowsky-Bree
>
Sorry
I wanted to confirm it concerning the number of nodes that was able to be
treated.
When confirming it, this problem was found by chance.
Regard,
Yamauchi.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lars
> Marowsky-Bree
> Sent: Sunday,
Sorry...
I will confirm the problem again in a new package tomorrow.
It registers if afterwards, there is a problem.
Therefore, it has not registered in bugzilla yet.
Regard,
Yamauchi.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lars
> Marowsky-
On 2007-06-30T14:46:35, David Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >should tell you which RAs the LRM finds on the filesystem. The LRM, in
> >turn, looks at OCF_RA_DIR (which is set at compile time), and is based
> >on OCF_ROOT_DIR. If that isn't overridden in the centos specfile, it
> >should th
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2007-06-30T11:34:24, David Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a config file or anything the GUI relies on for where to look
for these scripts? Are there similar config items/elements for the main
heartbeat binaries on where to look?
The GUI, vi
On 2007-06-30T11:34:24, David Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a config file or anything the GUI relies on for where to look
> for these scripts? Are there similar config items/elements for the main
> heartbeat binaries on where to look?
The GUI, via the mgmtd process, just queri
Hi,
while writing the o2cb RA for autoconfiguring the Oracle Cluster
Filesystem membership layer I arrived at what I think to be a neat
conclusion for the problem of configuring all nodes in the same way, and
distributing a configuration file across all nodes.
It also shows how powerful the CIB/C
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2007-06-29T18:26:46, David Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi I just installed the heartbeat rpm and the gui rpm using yum on
centos 5, however I noticed from the gui there are no OCF scripts listed
in the resource section at all. Under further examination
On 2007-06-29T18:26:46, David Erickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi I just installed the heartbeat rpm and the gui rpm using yum on
> centos 5, however I noticed from the gui there are no OCF scripts listed
> in the resource section at all. Under further examination it is only
> listing scr
On 2007-06-30T06:14:50, YAMAUCHI HIDEO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is the following that I used.
>
> http://linux-ha.org/download/index.html#2.0.8
> (Source tar ball for 2.0.8)
>
> It constructed with the source and it used it.
>
> Moreover, I am using the Redhat 4(Update2).
This is much t
On 2007-06-30T06:04:34, YAMAUCHI HIDEO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Again, the log is confirmed and registered.
"confirmed and registered"? Where? I don't see a bug report from you in
bugzilla. Where did you send it to?
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead Kernel, SuSE Labs, Research and Development
On 2007-06-30T06:14:35, YAMAUCHI HIDEO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I confirmed the maximum checks of the number of nodes.
> It is not thought that it uses it by never 100 nodes.
I apologize, but I do not understand what you wrote.
Do you mean to say that you wanted to test the maximum node size
On 2007-06-30T16:15:27, Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you need to use the crm_master command.
> either increase the value on the secondary or reduce it on the primary.
>
> the master will be placed on the machine with the highest value.
We need to fix this to make the master value
>On 6/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi together,
>>
>> I have to set up some sles 10 sp1 / heartbeat 2 clusters running xen
>> virtual machines mirrored with drbd as well as jboss portals. The new
>> documetation at the novell web site for sles 10 sp1 is very fine, thank
On 6/30/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi together,
I have to set up some sles 10 sp1 / heartbeat 2 clusters running xen
virtual machines mirrored with drbd as well as jboss portals. The new
documetation at the novell web site for sles 10 sp1 is very fine, thank you
very much
Hi together,
I have to set up some sles 10 sp1 / heartbeat 2 clusters running xen
virtual machines mirrored with drbd as well as jboss portals. The new
documetation at the novell web site for sles 10 sp1 is very fine, thank you
very much for all that helped to build it !
The cluster is running f
On 2007-06-29T17:24:33, Alex Litvak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Of course getting an official release will encourage people that
> maintain packages for RHEL / CentOS / White Box Linux etc ... to release
> RPMS with better compatibility.
The packages on the openSUSE build service should be "co
On 2007-06-29T11:38:19, David Lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> automated test builds are useful for testing, but what do we need to do to
> get another release? (since Lars is reccomending that people not use the
> current release)
>
> I know that Alan has a torture test that he runs releases
On 2007-06-29T17:14:25, Eddie C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would suggest getting the latest. Linux HA seems to have a steady
> growth of bug fixes and features. Sure version 2.0.1 might work find
> for me, but I may not be using all the features, if you are having a
> problem someone is likely
On 2007-06-30T05:59:14, YAMAUCHI HIDEO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I set the timeout of first monitor for 10 second.
>
> Next, I changed the timeout of the monitor by the command.
>
>cibadmin -U -o resource -X '... timeout="10s" ..'
>
> I hoped that it was reflected.
>
On 2007-06-30T05:59:13, YAMAUCHI HIDEO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In this situation, is there the method how it is easy to return the resource
> that failed in a start to an original node?
crm_resource -C can be used to cleanup the failed start.
It's an on-going discussion between Andrew and
On 6/29/07, YAMAUCHI HIDEO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
OK.
The log is confirmed, and registered.
Moreover, a version here is tried, and reported.
Sorry, what log are you talking about?
Did you file a bug?
And in reference to your other email, 2.0.8 is horribly old (and in
many respects plai
i've just uploaded a new spec file that hopefully resolves both of these issues.
give the build system a few minutes to rebuild everything and let me
know (the -X.Y version numbers will increase to indicate that the
package was updated)
On 6/30/07, Alex Litvak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Also, I
27 matches
Mail list logo
