[Linux-HA] Detecting drive failure and demoting

Hi All, I have recently setup a 2-node iSCSI fail-over array backed onto shared SAS MD3000 storage. I have everything (including RDAC) working fine on my Debian Etch nodes - however I am curious if it is possible to get heartbeat to demote itself if it loses access to the disks - I am

Re: [Linux-HA] dev can not up a fail count for monitor timeout

On 2007-12-19T21:19:48, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave, Dejan and (if possible) Lars: I have put this patch into 'test'. PLEASE begin testing it at your earliest convenience. Is there any specific reason why you did not push it into dev? Regards, Lars -- Teamlead

Re: [Linux-HA] segfault when trying to put date_spec/date_expression

I'm a bit lost ... I couldn't install this package, because it's built for etch, and I'm having conflicts. Is there anywhere where I can get the source of this build ? I'll make my own package with it and keep you informed. Thanks a lot for helping. Le Wednesday 19 December 2007 17:21:18

[Linux-HA] prevent resource switching

Hi everyone! I have a question about switching resources. Cluster consist of 2 nodes, one fails and the other one takes over. Lets say the failed one come up again, is there a way to prevent that the failed one takes the resources over again? I tried the default_resource_stickiness parameter,

Re: [Linux-HA] dev can not up a fail count for monitor timeout

On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:43:21AM +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: On 2007-12-19T21:19:48, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dave, Dejan and (if possible) Lars: I have put this patch into 'test'. PLEASE begin testing it at your earliest convenience. Is there any specific

Re: [Linux-HA] Detecting drive failure and demoting

Hi, On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 05:48:10PM +0900, Trent Lloyd wrote: Hi All, I have recently setup a 2-node iSCSI fail-over array backed onto shared SAS MD3000 storage. How is this thing connected: is it iSCSI or SAS? I have everything (including RDAC) working fine on my Debian Etch

Re: [Linux-HA] FTP server(s) and heartbeat problem

Hi, On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 06:39:44PM +0100, Giuseppe Castellucci wrote: Hi guys, first of all sorry for my english if you'll find some errors. I have a problem with heartbeat and ftp servers (both vsftpd, which i prefer to use, and proftpd). I have two servers (latest debian stable, with

Re: [Linux-HA] Detecting drive failure and demoting

Hi Dejan, On 20/12/2007, at 7:50 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi, On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 05:48:10PM +0900, Trent Lloyd wrote: Hi All, I have recently setup a 2-node iSCSI fail-over array backed onto shared SAS MD3000 storage. How is this thing connected: is it iSCSI or SAS? Sorry that

Re: [Linux-HA] cluster fails over, but does not reboot the failed node, why?

Hi, On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 11:47:55AM +0100, Johan Hoeke wrote: LS, Happy holidays everybody! Am please to say I've gotten a cluster up and running, which goes to show that even regular folks can have a go ;) Haven't gotten the hbaping to work on x86_64, but I'll save that for

Re: [Linux-HA] cluster fails over, but does not reboot the failed node, why?

Hi Johan, On 20/12/2007, at 7:47 PM, Johan Hoeke wrote: LS, Happy holidays everybody! Am please to say I've gotten a cluster up and running, which goes to show that even regular folks can have a go ;) Haven't gotten the hbaping to work on x86_64, but I'll save that for another day. Check

Re: [Linux-HA] cluster fails over, but does not reboot the failed node, why?

Hi Johan, On 20/12/2007, at 8:51 PM, Johan Hoeke wrote: Trent Lloyd wrote: Hi Johan, On 20/12/2007, at 7:47 PM, Johan Hoeke wrote: LS, Happy holidays everybody! Am please to say I've gotten a cluster up and running, which goes to show that even regular folks can have a go ;) Haven't

Re: [Linux-HA] cluster fails over, but does not reboot the failed node, why?

Trent Lloyd wrote: Hi Johan, On 20/12/2007, at 8:51 PM, Johan Hoeke wrote: Trent Lloyd wrote: Hi Johan, On 20/12/2007, at 7:47 PM, Johan Hoeke wrote: LS, Happy holidays everybody! Am please to say I've gotten a cluster up and running, which goes to show that even regular folks can

Re: [Linux-HA] Detecting drive failure and demoting

Hi, On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:15:12PM +0900, Trent Lloyd wrote: Hi Dejan, On 20/12/2007, at 7:50 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi, On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 05:48:10PM +0900, Trent Lloyd wrote: Hi All, I have recently setup a 2-node iSCSI fail-over array backed onto shared SAS MD3000

RE: [Linux-HA] prevent resource switching

On Thu 12/20/2007 2:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hi everyone! I have a question about switching resources. Cluster consist of 2 nodes, one fails and the other one takes over. Lets say the failed one come up again, is there a way to prevent that the failed one takes the resources over again?

Re: [Linux-HA] Detecting drive failure and demoting

Hi Dejan, On 20/12/2007, at 9:54 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi, On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:15:12PM +0900, Trent Lloyd wrote: Hi Dejan, On 20/12/2007, at 7:50 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi, On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 05:48:10PM +0900, Trent Lloyd wrote: Hi All, I have recently setup a

Re: [Linux-HA] Detecting drive failure and demoting

Hi, On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:47:02PM +0900, Trent Lloyd wrote: Hi Dejan, On 20/12/2007, at 9:54 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi, On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:15:12PM +0900, Trent Lloyd wrote: Hi Dejan, On 20/12/2007, at 7:50 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote: Hi, On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at

RE: [Linux-HA] prevent resource switching

On Thu 12/20/2007 7:14 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic said: Hi, On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:31:16AM -0500, Scott Mann wrote: On Thu 12/20/2007 2:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hi everyone! I have a question about switching resources. Cluster consist of 2 nodes, one fails and the other one takes

Re: [Linux-HA] prevent resource switching

Quoting Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi, On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:31:16AM -0500, Scott Mann wrote: On Thu 12/20/2007 2:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hi everyone! I have a question about switching resources. Cluster consist of 2 nodes, one fails and the other one takes over. Lets

RE: [Linux-HA] prevent resource switching

Quoting Scott Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Thu 12/20/2007 2:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hi everyone! I have a question about switching resources. Cluster consist of 2 nodes, one fails and the other one takes over. Lets say the failed one come up again, is there a way to prevent that the

[Linux-HA] DRBD V8 and Heartbeat V2

I saw the docs on linux-ha.org for using Heartbeat V2 with DRBD 7 in a master / slave arrangement. It also says the configuration is not for version 8 of DRBD. I have a few questions about this: 1) Is there a document that describes doing the same thing with DRBD 8? 2) What is the

[Linux-HA] cl_status ERROR / nagios

I'm using heartbeat 2 without crm. I'm trying to figure out why the nagios check_heartbeat_link isn't working. It's using cl_status but cl_status isn't working. [EMAIL PROTECTED] contrib]# cl_status hbstatus Heartbeat is running on this machine. cl_status[5458]: 2007/12/20_11:49:29 ERROR:

Re: [Linux-HA] cl_status ERROR / nagios

On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 11:55:47AM -0800, Rois Cannon wrote: I'm using heartbeat 2 without crm. I'm trying to figure out why the nagios check_heartbeat_link isn't working. It's using cl_status but cl_status isn't working. [EMAIL PROTECTED] contrib]# cl_status hbstatus Heartbeat is

[Linux-HA] DRBD Config

Hello, we are using a two node cluster master/slave with an openSuSE 10.3, heartbeat 2.0.7 and drbd 8.0.6. I tried the configuration from this webpage: http://www.linux-ha.org/DRBD/HowTov2 Dec 20 12:57:49 mylogin1 drbd[7119]: [7131]: DEBUG: : Calling /sbin/drbdadm -c /etc/drbd.conf state