Optionally, what does HB do when it receives a
status=2 after calling a RA MONITOR operation ?
/usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/.ocf-returncodes:
OCF_SUCCESS=0
OCF_ERR_GENERIC=1
OCF_ERR_ARGS=2
OCF_ERR_UNIMPLEMENTED=3
OCF_ERR_PERM=4
OCF_ERR_INSTALLED=5
OCF_ERR_CONFIGURED=6
OCF_NOT_RUNNING=7
OCF
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Joe Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It is also advisable that it accurately report
>> the service's true state after a start operation
>> and mandatory for a stop.
>> This is easily done by calling a level 0 check
>> in a loop at the end of both functions.
>
>
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 15:36 +0200, Sander van Vugt wrote:
> >
> >
> >> ^ The guys from NTT and Novell China submitted quite a few patches which
> >> have improved the GUI significantly.
> >>
> >
> > And they have been doing a really great job!
> >
> >
> Agreed, worked with the new GUI
On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 14:17 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On May 28, 2008, at 12:48 PM, Sander van Vugt wrote:
>
> > Hi List,
> >
> > I noticed some nice improvements in the hb_gui in SLES10 SP2. In the
> > past however, I've learned not to trust the hb_gui. Is it to be
> > trusted again now
> It is also advisable that it accurately report
> the service's true state after a start operation
> and mandatory for a stop.
> This is easily done by calling a level 0 check
> in a loop at the end of both functions.
Sure, but HB's business being calling RAs to perform
all those STARTs and STOP
Hi,
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 07:51:53AM -0700, Joe Bill wrote:
> >> It suggests that the RA implementation of the
> 'START'
> >> and 'STOP' operations, should include the code as
> to
> >> perform, before exiting, ALL the tests that are
> >> carried out at ALL implemented check-levels of
> >> monit
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Joe Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> It suggests that the RA implementation of the
> 'START'
>>> and 'STOP' operations, should include the code as
> to
>>> perform, before exiting, ALL the tests that are
>>> carried out at ALL implemented check-levels of
>>> moni
>> It suggests that the RA implementation of the
'START'
>> and 'STOP' operations, should include the code as
to
>> perform, before exiting, ALL the tests that are
>> carried out at ALL implemented check-levels of
>> monitoring, as to reliably return a resource's
>> status,
> It just relies on the
On May 28, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Ciro Iriarte wrote:
2008/5/28 Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Ciro Iriarte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi, i'm having general issues with a SLES10 SP2 installation
(update)
and I'm looking forward to do a clean installation
^ The guys from NTT and Novell China submitted quite a few patches which
have improved the GUI significantly.
And they have been doing a really great job!
Agreed, worked with the new GUI for the entire day and didn't see any
problems. :-)
___
Hi,
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 02:17:28PM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On May 28, 2008, at 12:48 PM, Sander van Vugt wrote:
>
>> Hi List,
>>
>> I noticed some nice improvements in the hb_gui in SLES10 SP2. In the past
>> however, I've learned not to trust the hb_gui. Is it to be trusted again
>
2008/5/28 Andrew Beekhof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Ciro Iriarte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi, i'm having general issues with a SLES10 SP2 installation (update)
>> and I'm looking forward to do a clean installation and use the
>> included packages where possible. Cu
On May 28, 2008, at 12:48 PM, Sander van Vugt wrote:
Hi List,
I noticed some nice improvements in the hb_gui in SLES10 SP2. In the
past however, I've learned not to trust the hb_gui. Is it to be
trusted again now, or should I still use cibadmin with xml files?
I'm told we can trust it ag
Hello,
Thanks David this actually solved all the build problems ! I will now
do some tests on Solaris 10.
Regards,
Jan C.
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 12:53 PM, David Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 May 2008, Jan Chaloupecky wrote:
>
>> After some failed attempts to make HA run on Solaris
Hi,
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 01:41:07PM +0200, Andreas Reschke wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
> it doesn't work for me:
> bgstsapgtsls1:~ # /etc/init.d/heartbeat start
> Starting High-Availability services2008/05/28_12:05:47 INFO: Resource is
> stopped
> heartbeat[18617]: 2008/05/28_12:05:47 ERROR: Invalid S
Hi Dejan,
it doesn't work for me:
bgstsapgtsls1:~ # /etc/init.d/heartbeat start
Starting High-Availability services2008/05/28_12:05:47 INFO: Resource is
stopped
heartbeat[18617]: 2008/05/28_12:05:47 ERROR: Invalid Stonith configuration
parameter [ bgstsapgtsls2 10.20.12.24 root password]
heartbe
On a fresh SLES10 SP2 this gives you (I also added rpm -qa for heartbeat
so you can see the version):
testserver:~ # stonith -L
apcmaster
apcmastersnmp
apcsmart
baytech
bladehpi
cyclades
drac3
external/ibmrsa
external/ibmrsa-telnet
external/ipmi
external/rackpdu
external/riloe
external/ssh
externa
Hi List,
I noticed some nice improvements in the hb_gui in SLES10 SP2. In the
past however, I've learned not to trust the hb_gui. Is it to be trusted
again now, or should I still use cibadmin with xml files?
Thanks,
Sander
___
Linux-HA mailing list
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:48 AM, Junko IKEDA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's not such a big problem,
> Just out of curiosity.
>
> If crm_resource is called, I can see the following message in
> /var/log/messages.
>
> May 28 17:16:16 prec370d crm_resource: [11279]: info: Invoked: crm_reso
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:02 AM, Joe Bill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I also assume that HB performs a 'monitor
>>> check-level 0' *after* a successful "start"
>>> or "stop".
>>> Is this correct ?
>
>> No. If the RA exits with success (0) the action's
>> considered to have been successful. (Hmm
Hi,
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 11:08:37AM +0100, Joao Ferreira wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> where can I find a list of STONITH devices supported by heartbeat ?
You can try stonith -L.
Thanks,
Dejan
>
> thank you.
>
> joao
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous co
Hi,
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 02:02:44AM -0700, Joe Bill wrote:
> >> I also assume that HB performs a 'monitor
> >> check-level 0' *after* a successful "start"
> >> or "stop".
> >> Is this correct ?
>
> > No. If the RA exits with success (0) the action's
> > considered to have been successful. (Hmm
Hello all,
where can I find a list of STONITH devices supported by heartbeat ?
thank you.
joao
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists
Hi,
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 08:32:51AM +0200, Andreas Reschke wrote:
> Hello,
> I've created a HA-Cluster with 2 IBM 3650 with RSA-Adapter and SuSE Linux
> Enterprise 10 SP1 (64Bit). When the slave-server take over the service
> (SAP), he must poweroff the master-server over the RSA-Adapter with
>> I also assume that HB performs a 'monitor
>> check-level 0' *after* a successful "start"
>> or "stop".
>> Is this correct ?
> No. If the RA exits with success (0) the action's
> considered to have been successful. (Hmm, how does
> that sound :)
Ugh ! Terrible, really ( ;-) ) !
It suggests tha
Hi,
It's not such a big problem,
Just out of curiosity.
If crm_resource is called, I can see the following message in
/var/log/messages.
May 28 17:16:16 prec370d crm_resource: [11279]: info: Invoked: crm_resource
-L
May 28 17:16:16 prec370d crm_resource: [11279]: WARN: main: here i am - 3
Loggi
26 matches
Mail list logo
