Re: [Linux-HA] Restricting communication to one network

2010-03-26 Thread Florian Haas
On 03/26/2010 09:05 PM, mike wrote: > We've got LinuxHA set up with a single IP takeover of a VIP. Very simple > set up and it works fine. This is set up between two Linux Servers on a > s390x LPAR. Each guest has 3 ethernet devices and associated networks. > I've been asked to ensure that all h

[Linux-HA] Restricting communication to one network

2010-03-26 Thread mike
We've got LinuxHA set up with a single IP takeover of a VIP. Very simple set up and it works fine. This is set up between two Linux Servers on a s390x LPAR. Each guest has 3 ethernet devices and associated networks. I've been asked to ensure that all hearteat communication occur over network #2

[Linux-HA] UDP / DHCP / LDIRECTORD

2010-03-26 Thread Brian Carpio
Hi, Currently I have a very unique situation where I need to load balance DHCP ACKs to two different real servers, my issue (and this hopefully is just a simple configuration issue) is that when we test our ldirectord load balacner all the DHCP ACKs go to a single "real server" if the source p

[Linux-HA] Debian, system reboot problem

2010-03-26 Thread artur . k
I have a problem with the pacemaker "Version: 1.0.7-6e1815972fc236825bf3658d7f8451d33227d420" on Linux Debian lenny. Often after a reboot of the system, pacemaker does not start. Crmd not started " WARN: route_ais_message: Sending message to local.crmd failed: " In the logs: Mar 26 10:23:02 b

Re: [Linux-HA] Problem with "partition WITHOUT quorum"

2010-03-26 Thread RaSca
Il giorno Gio 25 Mar 2010 19:00:34 CET, Michael Schwartzkopff ha scritto: > Am Donnerstag, 25. März 2010 15:19:55 schrieb RaSca: >> Hi all, >> I've got a very simple setup of two virtual machines (with Virtualbox) >> configured with Debian Lenny, Corosync 1.2.0-1 and Pacemaker >> 1.0.7+hg20100203-

Re: [Linux-HA] Is this normal?

2010-03-26 Thread Florian Haas
On 2010-03-26 03:17, mike wrote: > Suddenly realized it is normal because all clusters are broadcasting on > the same UDP port. I changed the ports and the messages are sticking to > their own clusters. You could also stick to the same port and use different multicast groups instead. Florian