>>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 04.04.2011 um 14:51 in
Nachricht <20110404125103.GK3553@squib>:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 06:39:08PM +0200, Pavlos Polianidis wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I am looking for a way to add/modify an op-option "op monitor
> on-fail="restart"" through a single
>>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 04.04.2011 um 13:56 in
Nachricht <20110404115618.GD3553@squib>:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 08:32:10AM +0200, Alain.Moulle wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I got a strange message about "... max_child_count (4) reached,
> > postponing execution of operation stop ..."
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 13:38 -0500, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
>
> crm configure primitive ClusterIP ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 \
> params ip=192.168.9.101 cidr_netmask=32 \
> op monitor interval=30s
>
> Does that mean heartbeat is being used to detect
> when to move the IP address to the standby server?
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:43:27AM +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> I am missing the state: running degraded or suboptimal.
> >>>
> >>> Yep, "degraded" is not a state available for pacemaker.
> >>> Pacemaker cannot do much about "suboptimal".
> Maybe we need to add OCF_RUNNING_
Greg:
> you can set up ldirectord as a Pacemaker resource and let
> Pacemaker handle the monitoring
I have been reading the Pacemaker user guide. It says when
adding an IP address to manager, use this command:
crm configure primitive ClusterIP ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 \
params ip=192.168.9.101 c
Greg:
> You don't say whether or not you are using Pacemaker.
> If you are, then you can set up ldirectord as a Pacemaker
> resource and let Pacemaker handle the monitoring.
Thanks for the extensive background info. It really
helps me understand the layout of the individual pieces.
I have not
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 11:44 -0500, Neil Aggarwal wrote:
> >From what I can figure out from the ha.cf file, heartbeat
> uses ping to tell if the peer is up.
Not really. It uses special heartbeat packets to tell if the peer is up.
Ping is used to tell the difference between a dead peer and a bad N
Neil Aggarwal wrote:
> I want to switch the virtual IP if the ldirectord process
> is not running or locked up. That may happen even if the
> network card is ok.
>
> Is there a way to do that?
Depends on your config. E.g. snmpd: "proc" for ldirectord with "procfix"
to run /usr/share/heartbeat
Hello:
I am trying to configure heartbeat to managed a shared
virtual IP between load balancers.
I used yum to install the heartbeat, heartbeat-ldirectord,
and ipvsadm packages on a CentOS 5.5 server.
>From what I can figure out from the ha.cf file, heartbeat
uses ping to tell if the peer is
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 05:51:28PM +0300, Pavlos Polianidis wrote:
> I know that this is wrong but I found a workaround :)
>
> If you login as a user, which is a member of haclient group, without loading
> its profile (su TEST instead su - TEST), and all users in haclient group have
> the p
I know that this is wrong but I found a workaround :)
If you login as a user, which is a member of haclient group, without loading
its profile (su TEST instead su - TEST), and all users in haclient group have
the permission to write into /var/lib/heartbeat/crm then you can run the crm
command a
Dear Dejan
The versions I have used are:
pacemaker-1.0.10-1.4.el5
cluster-glue-1.0.6-1.6.el5
below are the actions I took:
crm(live)options# user TEST
crm(live)options# save
crm(live)options# show
editor "vim"
pager "less"
user "TEST"
skill-level "expert"
output "color"
colorscheme "yellow,n
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:23:32AM -0700, Robinson, Eric wrote:
> Greetings! We have a few Corosync+PaceMaker+DRBD clusters and a couple
> older Heartbeat+DRBD clusters. Our infrastructure is currently located
> in a single facility. We have the opportunity to establish a DR site in
> another
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 03:58:06PM +0300, Pavlos Polianidis wrote:
> Thank for the respond.
>
> What I did is in order to run the crm_resource command as a user (let's say
> TEST) I added the user "TEST" to the haclient group. But the command "crm" is
> refuses to run as TEST. I will try to add
Thank for the respond.
What I did is in order to run the crm_resource command as a user (let's say
TEST) I added the user "TEST" to the haclient group. But the command "crm" is
refuses to run as TEST. I will try to add a specific command to sudoers and see
if it works
Kind regards,
Pavlos Pol
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 06:39:08PM +0200, Pavlos Polianidis wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am looking for a way to add/modify an op-option "op monitor
> on-fail="restart"" through a single command besides using the crm cli. I
> tried with crm_resource but no luck. I need the command to use it in
Hi,
Thanks to all input, I finally managed to get a working NFS cluster using
the exportfs RA and works like it should.
Only i HAVE to mount the nfs share using UDP, because when I mount using TCP
the connection is not reinstated after a failover.
Is there a workaround for this so I can use TCP? W
Dear all,
I'm having a bit of peculiar problem with Heartbeat. I'm installing a new HA
cluster with Heartbeat and pacemaker. Right now there is only one node
installed, because I'm preparing the install image for the entire cluster.
Anyway, since the last restart of the machine, heartbeat is in
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 02:00:26PM +0200, Alain.Moulle wrote:
> OK that's clear, but it sounds a little risky too to increase this
> parameter ?
That depends on the resources you run. Unfortunately, there's no
way (yet) to assign "weight" to resources. BTW, you don't need
to increase it if you c
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 01:56:07PM +0200, Alain.Moulle wrote:
> Hi Dejan,
> I had without doubt miss it because effectively your command works fine ...
>
> PS :just for my knowledge : what's the meaning of the "-" at the end ?
It means "read the stdin". Need to update the doc.
Thanks,
Dejan
>
OK that's clear, but it sounds a little risky too to increase this
parameter ?
By the way I'm working with corosync, not heartbeat, so do you think it is
all the same "tunable" ?
Thanks
Alain
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 08:32:10AM +0200, Alain.Moulle wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I got a strange
Hi Dejan,
I had without doubt miss it because effectively your command works fine ...
PS :just for my knowledge : what's the meaning of the "-" at the end ?
Thanks a lot
Alain
Dejan Muhamedagic a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:52:37PM +0200, Alain.Moulle wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> S
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 08:32:10AM +0200, Alain.Moulle wrote:
> Hi
>
> I got a strange message about "... max_child_count (4) reached,
> postponing execution of operation stop ..." on a resource.
>
> What is the meaning of this max_child_count ?
lrmd (the local resource manager) won't run
Am 04.04.2011 10:32, schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Christoph Bartoschek
> wrote:
>> It seems as if the g_nfs service is stopped on the surviving node when
>> the other one comes up again.
>
> To me it looks like the service gets stopped after it fails:
>
> p_expo
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 10:42 +0200, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Muhammad Sharfuddin
> wrote:
> > we have two resources A and B
> > Cluster starts A on node1, and B on node2, while failover node for A is
> > node2 and failover node for B is node1
> >
> > B cant start wi
Il giorno Sab 02 Apr 2011 19:04:08 CET, Alessandro Iurlano ha scritto:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:34 AM, RaSca wrote:
>>> Then I tried to find a way to keep just the rmtab file synchronized on
>>> both nodes. I cannot find a way to have pacemaker do this for me. Is
>>> there one?
>> As far as I k
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Muhammad Sharfuddin
wrote:
> we have two resources A and B
> Cluster starts A on node1, and B on node2, while failover node for A is
> node2 and failover node for B is node1
>
> B cant start without A, so I have following location rules:
>
> order first_A_
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Alain.Moulle wrote:
> Hi,
> I got this error :
> 1301591983 2011 Mar 31 19:19:43 berlin5 daemon err crm_resource [36968]:
> ERROR: native_add_running: Resource
> stonith::fence_ipmilan:restofenceberlin4 appears to be active on 2 nodes.
> 1301591983 2011 Mar 31 19:19
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 9:58 PM, Christoph Bartoschek
wrote:
> It seems as if the g_nfs service is stopped on the surviving node when
> the other one comes up again.
To me it looks like the service gets stopped after it fails:
p_exportfs_root:0_monitor_3 (node=laplace, call=12, rc=7,
sta
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Christoph Bartoschek
wrote:
> Am 01.04.2011 16:38, schrieb Lars Ellenberg:
>> On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 11:35:19AM +0200, Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
>>> Am 01.04.2011 11:27, schrieb Florian Haas:
On 2011-04-01 10:49, Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
> Am 01.04.20
Hi,
I got this error :
1301591983 2011 Mar 31 19:19:43 berlin5 daemon err crm_resource [36968]:
ERROR: native_add_running: Resource
stonith::fence_ipmilan:restofenceberlin4 appears to be active on 2 nodes.
1301591983 2011 Mar 31 19:19:43 berlin5 daemon warning crm_resource
[36968]: WARN: See
ht
Hi there,
I asked the same question some time ago and received no suitable answer so far.
DRBD [1] does no "proper" replication over three nodes; it's basically still a
Two-Node-RAID-1 with a third node, which doesn't really take part in the
cluster but receives replication data as kind of a "b
32 matches
Mail list logo
