Il giorno Ven 13 Mag 2011 16:09:14 CET, Viacheslav Biriukov ha scritto: > In your case you have two drbd master. So, I think, it is not a good > idea to create that collocation. Instead of this you can set location > directives to locate vm-test_virtualdomain where you want to be default. > For example: > location L_vm-test_virtualdomain_01 vm-test_virtualdomain 100: master1.node > location L_vm-test_virtualdomain_02 vm-test_virtualdomain 10: master2.node
And I agree to your point of view (since I test that the colocation is not working). But the point is: why? I mean, the colocation defines that the drbd device must run in a node where drbd is Master. Why Pacemaker puts drbd in slave on the node in which the migration start? Does a colocation like this: colocation vm-test_virtualdomain_ON_vm-test_ms-r0 inf: vm-test_virtualdomain vm-test_ms-r0:Master Implicit that once the resource go away it becomes slave? -- RaSca Mia Mamma Usa Linux: Niente รจ impossibile da capire, se lo spieghi bene! ra...@miamammausalinux.org http://www.miamammausalinux.org _______________________________________________ Linux-HA mailing list Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha See also: http://linux-ha.org/ReportingProblems
