On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:32:01AM +0200, Sascha Hagedorn wrote:
> Hello Dejan,
>
> Yes, the cluster is running an active. This behavior is also reproducible on
> a different cluster running the same versions. I am going to file a bug
> report.
OK. Please provide the logs. BTW, did you check pe
Hi!
I have a question: when I want to have a filesystem on a logical volume, where
the VG is on a RAID1, I would typically have three resources to handle that.
Now if I wish to have a clone or ms resource, how could I connect the resources
so that the resource's nodes find the desired filesyste
Hello Dejan,
Yes, the cluster is running an active. This behavior is also reproducible on a
different cluster running the same versions. I am going to file a bug report.
Thanks,
Sascha
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org [mailto:linux-ha-
> boun...@lis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi everybody,
The current resource agent repository [1] has been tagged to v3.9.2.
Tarballs are also available [2].
This is a quick bug fix release to address a couple of regressions
introduced during 3.9.1 development cycle.
Highlights for the LH
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 12:40:12PM +0200, Sascha Hagedorn wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am having troubles adding a new LSB resource to my cluster configuration. I
> already have multiple LSB resources in my configuration which work fine. Now,
> after a couple of months (and installed updates
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 03:57:13PM +1000, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 3:19 AM, Maxim Ianoglo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >> The http monitoring code should be split off from the apache RA.
> >> Then a simple stateless (see the Dummy RA for a sample) RA, say
> >> httpmon, can be cre
