Hi Andreas ,
thanks for your response, but two questions :
1/ why going with GFS2 ? because you know that ocfs2+pacemaker still does
not
work fine on rhel ? or ... ?
2/ you're right GFS2 is working much better with pacemaker than OCFS2, but
the problem
is that GFS2 was about 10 times
Hi
No , sorry, I have no more this configuration right now, but there were
many msg at the end of 2010 with regard
to my configuration and my problems.
but anyway, my request in this thread was :
did somebody succeed to have a robust HA configuration on RHEL with
the stack Pacemaker/corosync and
Hi,
I'm making a two-node cluster for a dns caching server
(unbound) on two Ubuntu 10.04 hosts.
I'm pretty clueless about how to control the unbound application.
(I'm also a cluster newbie).
Because there is no ocf resource file for unbound, and I don't
know how to make one, I assume I can
Le 03/02/2012 11:35, torben fjerdingstad a écrit :
I tried to create an ocf script,
/usr/lib/ocf/resource.d/heartbeat/unbound, but gave up,
and instead added a status command to the /etc/init.d/unbound
(for LSB compliance), and copied it to /etc/ha.d/resource.d/
What next? I can't figure
Hello,
On 02/03/2012 09:29 AM, alain.mou...@bull.net wrote:
Hi Andreas ,
thanks for your response, but two questions :
1/ why going with GFS2 ? because you know that ocfs2+pacemaker still does
not
work fine on rhel ? or ... ?
Because GFS2 is actively developed mostly by Redhat
