The need for a resync is because you didn't have a fence device setup so
it split-brained. If you use it with the 'crm-fence-peer.sh' fence
handler this would not happen.
Even without DRBD you will need fencing in a cluster to maintain sanity
and avoid losing data.
On 02/01/2013 06:39 PM, Paul Ar
Thanks so much for the quick, detailed, and informative answer!
I'll definitely go with building the latest and greatest of corosync and
pacemaker.
As far as the cluster I already have setup, I'll have to get those configs on
Monday. Oh, and FWIW, I tried using DRBD with KVM, but found it too fr
Hello Paul,
I've recently worked through building the latest versions of Corosync (2.1.0 at
the time) and Pacemaker (1.1.8) on Ubuntu 12.04. I think you'll have the best
results if you work with the latest version of these services so that you
don't run into bugs that have since been fixed. If yo
On 02/01/2013 03:36 PM, Paul Archer wrote:
> Sorry for the noob-ish question, but Google is not my friend today.
>
> I'm trying to setup a cluster to support KVM/libvirt failover. I have one
> running with corosync 1.4.2 and pacemaker 1.16 on Ubuntu 12.04. It works OK
> for virtual IP and apache
Sorry for the noob-ish question, but Google is not my friend today.
I'm trying to setup a cluster to support KVM/libvirt failover. I have one
running with corosync 1.4.2 and pacemaker 1.16 on Ubuntu 12.04. It works OK for
virtual IP and apache failover, but I've had a lot of trouble getting it t
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Ulrich Windl
wrote:
Andreas Kurz schrieb am 19.06.2012 um 10:48 in
Nachricht
> <4fe03cc1.3020...@hastexo.com>:
>> On 06/19/2012 04:00 AM, Martin Marji Cermak wrote:
>> > Hello guys,
>> > I have 3 questions if you please.
>> >
>> > I have a HA NFS c
2013/2/1
> Hi
>
> Reading this mroning the other opened thread about "Problem with exportfs"
> , I'm thinking about another problem I faced with exportfs :
>
> on rhel, when command exportfs -u successfully returns, you may think you
> could umount the FS exported, but this is not always true,
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 09:47:21AM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> >>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 01.02.2013 um 08:53 in
> Nachricht <20130201075338.GA29620@walrus.homenet>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 08:24:46AM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > While trying to develop
>>> Dejan Muhamedagic schrieb am 01.02.2013 um 08:53 in
Nachricht <20130201075338.GA29620@walrus.homenet>:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 08:24:46AM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > While trying to develop an improved exportfs RA that can export one
> filesystem to a list of names
On 02/01/2013 08:53 AM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 08:24:46AM +0100, Ulrich Windl wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> While trying to develop an improved exportfs RA that can export one
>> filesystem to a list of names (instead of just one name), I found an error:
>>
>> exportfs is
Hi!
It seems I have to answer my own message:
It seems that "blktap" is nort working reliably, but "blktap" seems to do.
Unfortunately in SLES11 SP2 the "blktap" Module is loaded (automatically), but
the "blktap2" is not. If you load the module manually, and use "tap2:aio"
(tapdisk2) instead,
11 matches
Mail list logo
