The problem seems to be fixed. I have changed nothing in my
configuration, but we had a problem in our network (it seems to be a
loop in the spanning tree of some vlans). Once the network problem was
fixed, the cluster run without problems.
El 06/06/13 10:26, Angel L. Mateo escribió:
Hello
this same configuration but
without redundant ring (that is, without altname options and dlm
control=detect and rrp_mode=none) but with the same problem.
Any help?
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Información
y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas
.
But is this CLVM really necessary? Or it is enough to configure LVM
with fencing and stonith?
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Información
y las Comunicaciones Aplicadas (ATICA)
http://www.um.es/atica
Tfo: 868889150
Fax: 86337
as a workaround for the snapshot (but I have a
10TB FS and dd is not an option).
So my question continue, is clvm really needed? Or legacy LVM with
fencing and stonich mechanism would be enough?
--
Angel L. Mateo Martínez
Sección de Telemática
Área de Tecnologías de la Información
y las
