Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008-07-31T16:44:31, Angel Rengifo Cancino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep, it's because I'm first trying to understand very well heartbeat
1.x before learning 2.x style. Using haresources it seems easier for
my simple requirements.
That's not necessarily
Hi people:
I'm a newbie in heartbeat and I don't speak English very well yet.
I'm getting started with two virtual machines (vmware) running Centos
5.2 and heartbeat 2.1.3. I'm working on heartbeat 1.x style without
crm and stonith configuration, and managing httpd and squid services.
I don't
straight to version 2, forget version 1.
just my opinion.
From: Angel Rengifo Cancino[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Date: 31/07/08 21:54
Subject: [Linux-HA] Resources starting twice
Hi people:
I'm a newbie in heartbeat and I don't speak English very well yet.
I'm
Hi all:
I'm wondering about the correct use of haresources when using 1.x
heartbeat style (Not CRM).Is it strongly necessary that haresource be
the same on both nodes? What about if I'm using auto_failback off?
Thanks
___
Linux-HA mailing list
