[Linux-HA] active/passive and SAN

Hi all, I need some advices about my configuration for high-availability. I would like to set up an active/passive configuration for our POP/IMAP server. We have two servers with each one two HBA cards (FC) attached to a SAN IBM DS4000 where we store the mailbox. My concern: In case of a f

Re: [Linux-HA] active/passive and SAN

Robert Wipfel a écrit : On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 9:51 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dejan Muhamedagic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:37:37PM +0200, FG wrote: Hi all, [...] Yes, you should use STONITH. Or perhaps so

[Linux-HA] CRM or not CRM for Active/Passive Imap Server ?

Hi all, I have two servers with each one two HBA cards (FC) attached to a SAN IBM DS4000 where we store the mailbox. These 2 servers are in Active/Passive configuration with heartbeat and use stonith to ensure no data corruption. I just want to know which interest i have to use crm configurat

[Linux-HA] failover test and behavior

Hi, I use heartbeat 2.1.1 in an active/passive configuration. I'am testing differents failover and need some explanations: My node are castor (active) and pollux (standby). I'm testing the process failover with monitoring. My configuration use default_stickiness = "200" and default_failure_stic

Re: [Linux-HA] failover test and behavior

Dejan Muhamedagic a écrit : > Hi, > > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 06:47:16PM +0200, FG wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I use heartbeat 2.1.1 in an active/passive configuration. >> >> I'am testing differents failover and need some explanations: >> >>

[Linux-HA] DC election

Hi, my config: active/passive cluster (2 nodes). The resources are configured to locate on the first node (castor). When i start heartbeat on the first node (castor) and then quickly on the second node (pollux), the resource are logically located on the first node (castor) but this is the second

[Linux-HA] stonith and failover problem

Hi, I use heartbeat 2.1.1 in an active/passive configuration. I'am testing differents failover and how stonith reacts ? When my active node is down (hardware failure or simply kill -9 PID(hb master)), Stonith with apcmastersnmp from my standby node shoot the active node and resources are fai

Re: [Linux-HA] stonith and failover problem

Andrew Beekhof a écrit : > On 9/19/07, FG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I use heartbeat 2.1.1 in an active/passive configuration. >> >> I'am testing differents failover and how stonith reacts ? >> >> >> When

Re: [Linux-HA] stonith and failover problem

Andrew Beekhof a écrit : > On 9/20/07, FG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Andrew Beekhof a écrit : >> >>> On 9/19/07, FG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I use heartbeat