-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Michael Schwartzkopff spake:
> On Thursday 04 November 2010 12:38:00 Timo Schoeler wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I'm running heartbeat 2.1.4 on top of a CentOS 5.5 x86_64 cluster. Those
>> machines provide a bunch of vi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
I'm running heartbeat 2.1.4 on top of a CentOS 5.5 x86_64 cluster. Those
machines provide a bunch of virtual IPs, managed by ldirectord.
It's not that many VIPs (36 at the moment), but after adding the last
ones I had to turn off net-snmpd o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Vadym Chepkov spake:
> On Oct 14, 2010, at 4:41 AM, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
Hey Vadim,
>> If you happen to be somehow target locked on heartbeat, tell us
>> why, and what you are trying to achieve, and we figure something
>> out.
>
> Sorry for ba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Florian Haas spake:
> On 2010-09-14 12:13, Nikita Michalko wrote:
>> Hi Florian,
>>
>> thank you very much for the link to webinar - very good work!
>> I have tried that on SLES in the meantime, but facing with the following
>> issue:
>> Downloa
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
is there any option to force a heartbeat v2.1.4 (yes, I know, I
should update to Pacemaker/OpenAIS -- however, I cannot at the
moment) cluster to use TCP messages instead of the 'usual' UDP/694,
e.g. in case one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Michael Schwartzkopff spake:
> Am Montag, den 16.08.2010, 16:14 +0200 schrieb Timo Schoeler:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> is there any option to force a heartbeat v2.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
is there any option to force a heartbeat v2.1.4 (yes, I know, I should
update to Pacemaker/OpenAIS -- however, I cannot at the moment) cluster
to use TCP messages instead of the 'usual' UDP/694, e.g. in case one
might think the network link is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
I have a production cluster running CentOS 5.3 and heartbeat 2.1.3 (the
ldirectord-package is, however, already 2.1.4 due to some circumstances).
It's a four node cluster with a pair of machines each at two
geographically different locations
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Ciro Iriarte spake:
> Hi, i'm planning to build a postfix+cyrus Active/Active cluster and
> would like to know if anybody has done something similar. My main
> doubt is about using ClusterIP or a loadbalancer with LVS in front of
> the two nodes.
e from the changelog). As this
is a very sensitive production system, I just cannot throw pacemaker
onto it before doing severe testing...
Timo
| On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Timo
| Schoeler wrote:
| Hi,
|
| the server [0] mentioned in the documentation [1] doesn't contain RPMs
| for 2.1.4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the server [0] mentioned in the documentation [1] doesn't contain RPMs
for 2.1.4 any more... or am I blind? I searched all sub directories, but
only found 'previous' 2.99.x releases.
Best,
Timo
[0] -- http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/s
dneday and Thursday. I know that Dejan will be there, at
least, on Thursday.
Anybody else?
Yapp, /me will be there. My office is less than minutes away from
Linuxtag, so almost any time will be okay for me.
Best,
--
Timo Schoeler - Systemadministrator
http://www.de.inter.net/
Inter.net Ge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Nicholas Dronen spake:
| Hi:
|
| I need to make a node ineligible to run resources if there appears to
| be a persistent hardware problem. I'm using IPMI (locally) to examine
| the state of the hardware. When there's an abnormal condition, I'd
|
Hi Robert,
> Hi timo,
>
> Thanks for your advise. But I have not understood how it can work. I
> thought nodes in a VPN can communicate with each other just like in a
> LAN, but how a request from WAN find the right host? Should I take
> another node as a VPN host?
Exactly. If you have (for exam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
hi,
| Hi all,
|
| I want to know if I can use Heartbeat in WAN enviroment. That means
| the two nodes are in different subnet.
|
| The key problem, I think, is how to change the virtual IP between two
| nodes. When one node failed, how the other one t
thus Michael Schwartzkopff spake:
> Am Mittwoch, 15. April 2009 16:29:23 schrieb Timo Schoeler:
>>>> Hi list,
>>>>
>>>> is there anybody running 2.1.4 on CentOS (5)? Recent rpms are 2.1.3-3
>>>> AFAICS.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
Hi list,
is there anybody running 2.1.4 on CentOS (5)? Recent rpms are 2.1.3-3
AFAICS.
Thanks for any hint,
Timo :)
Use 2.1.4 or pacemaker 1.0.3. It causes less headache.
Sure, that's what the tenor's here as well as what the changelogs say...
I'm just hesitating because there's no package
Hi list,
is there anybody running 2.1.4 on CentOS (5)? Recent rpms are 2.1.3-3
AFAICS.
Thanks for any hint,
Timo :)
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-ha.or
18 matches
Mail list logo
