> > Hi All,
> >
> > Just upgraded to Heartbeat 2.99.2-3.1 and Pacemaker 1.0.0-4.1
> running on CentOS 5.2.
> >
> > I haven't got any resources defined yet, so my cib only contains the
> node entries.
>
> and the attribute with says how to validate it (validate-with)
Yes.. pacemaker-1.0
>
> > I
> >> > Hi All,
> >> >
> >> > Just upgraded to Heartbeat 2.99.2-3.1 and Pacemaker 1.0.0-4.1
> >> running on CentOS 5.2.
> >> >
> >> > I haven't got any resources defined yet, so my cib only contains
> the
> >> node entries.
> >>
> >> and the attribute with says how to validate it (validate-with)
> >
Can anybody help me with this one?
Cheers,
Bart
- "bart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> > Hi All,
> > >> >
> > >> > Just upgraded to Heartbeat 2.99.2-3.1 and Pacemaker 1.0.0-4.1
> > >> running on CentOS 5.2.
Error: Missing Dependency: liblrm.so.2 is needed by package pacemaker
Or am I just missing a package?
Cheers,
Bart
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha
See also: http://linux-h
Hi,
> >
> > Or am I just missing a package?
>
> Probably.
> Which ones do have
>rpm -qa | grep -e heartbeat -e pacemaker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# rpm -qa | grep -e heartbeat -e pacemaker
libheartbeat2-2.99.2-3.1
h
> Hmmm - thats really weird.
>
> The liblrm.so.2 dependancy is an automatic one based the liblrm
> shared
> library that Pacemaker was built against.
> Perhaps you were unlucky and mirrored the repo at a point when it was
> rebuilding... refreshing your local mirror might help.
>
> As an advanta
>
> This looks like a slightly different issue since the SO number
> changed.
> I've just made some spec file changes to be sure I notice these SO
> increases in the future (which would require the libheartbeat number
> to go up too).
I do not completely understand what you're saying here.. But I
>
> Did you try installing with rpm instead of YUM?
> ___
Just did, but no luck. See output at the bottom of this post.
I looked a little further on the current packages installed. I noticed
/usr/lib/liblrm.so.0 is in libheartbeat2
I don't know the
>
> I've added this to the 2.99.2-6.1 version of the heartbeat packages
> (which are building at the moment)
> Can you give it a try and see if it resolves the issue?
Looks good now!
Thanks.
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http:/
Nice!
Does anyone have any experience with his box?
Also note that it's available in Europe as 9258S.. via ebay around 110 euro..
Cheers,
Bart
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "Ciro Iriarte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Aan: "General Linux-HA mailing list"
Verzo
AFAIK, pygrub does not support the 'drbd1:guest01-disk,xvda,w' notation in
RHEL/CentOS 5
Cheers,
Bart
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "Paras pradhan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Verzonden: Vrijd
r you
Cheers,
Bart
- Original Message -
From: "Paras pradhan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2008 7:26:28 PM GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin /
Bern / Rome / Stockholm / Vienna
Subject: [Linux-HA] Re: [DRBD-user] sample fil
It is included in Centos...
however since you mentioned centos... you use pygrub to boot you domainU's...
and block-drbd does not work with RH/centos..
Cheers,
Bart
- Original Message -
From: "Paras pradhan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "General Linux-HA mai
.
It's a pitty pygrub doesn't support block-drbd.. I hope this will change soon!
Cheers,
Bart
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: "Paras pradhan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Aan: "General Linux-HA mailing list"
Verzonden: Vrijdag 26 september 2008 21:55:29 GMT +01:0
Hi all,
I have a two node Heartbeat cluster (version 2.0.8). I'd like to have the
resources failover to the other node when rebooting or setting in standby.
For this I've set "Resource Stickyness" to "INFINITY" in hb_gui. At first,
this seemed to do the trick, but when I reboot a node, resourc
On Friday 28 November 2008 18:34, Alex Balashov wrote:
Alex,
thanks for this very quick and elaborate reply. Bless you ;-)
> Bart,
>
> All these stickiness settings and methods boil down to and manipulate
> one thing - the "score" assigned to each node.
>
> To ach
On Friday 28 November 2008 19:14, Alex Balashov wrote:
> > Fiew. Rocket-science. I kinda start to miss the old version 1 days ;-)
>
> You're not the only one. :-)
Glad you feel my pain ;-)
> I can definitely understand that. It can be quite complicated; it took
> me quite some time to get it
On Saturday 29 November 2008 09:56, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 20:03, Bart Coninckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Friday 28 November 2008 19:14, Alex Balashov wrote:
> >> > Fiew. Rocket-science. I kinda start to miss the old version 1 days ;
18 matches
Mail list logo