[Linux-HA] About status handling of ocf-ra

Hi I thought that the status was called by V1 mode of Heartbeat. However, status calls monitor in /etc/ha.d/resource.d/hto-mapfuncs. --- hto-mapfuncs:56 status) $__SCRIPT_NAME monitor;;# Mapping this to monitor is a bug --- Is the status processing an unnecessar

Re: [Linux-HA] HA version 3 and GUI ??

Hi Pacemaker-1.0 moves in the following versions. I think that I do not move in the latest edition. http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/pygui/rev/18332eae086e Tomo 2011/3/9 Jakob Curdes > > > Hi, > > > > you have to decide: heartbeat OR corosync. It makes no sense to install > both > > cluster

Re: [Linux-HA] Question about limits around resources .

Hi, I sent a half-finished email. I'm sorry. FYI,I dont simply that from my experience. > 2 and 4 node clusters running 1.0.x should easily handle 200 resources or so. > Clusters running >= 1.1.4 should be able to go even higher. 12 and 16 node clusters not running from pm-1.0.x(12 * 16 = 192).

Re: [Linux-HA] Question about limits around resources .

Hi, FYI,I dont simply that from my experience. 2 and 4 node clusters running 1.0.x should easily handle 200 resources or so. Clusters running >= 1.1.4 should be able to go even higher. 10resource Regards, Tomo 2010/12/9 Andrew Beekhof > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Alain.Moulle > wrote: