Re: [Linux-HA] [crmsh] Question about latest crmsh.

Hi Kristoffer, Thank you for comments. All right! About "commit replace", I confirm it on Monday. Many Thanks! Hideo Yamauchi. - Original Message - > From: Kristoffer Grönlund > To: renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp; General Linux-HA mailing list > ; LINUX-HA > Cc: > Date: 2014/11/28, F

[Linux-HA] [crmsh] Question about latest crmsh.

Hi All, We used the latest edition of crmsh-b932826fb4f924137eab9efd13b7bddf8afde3f0 with Pacamerk1.1.12. We sent the following CLI file. --- ## Cluster Option ### property no-quorum-policy="ignore" \         stonith-enabled="false" ### Resource Defaults

Re: [Linux-HA] Trying to compile pacemaker-pygui

Hi William, > When I try tip.tar.bz2 (or 4186ac0c02b5.tar.bz2; the same file), the > compilation > fails with: > > mgmt_crm.c: In function ‘on_get_rsc_status’: > mgmt_crm.c:1512: error: ‘pe_rsc_failure_ignored’ undeclared (first use in this > function) The "pe_rsc_failure_ignored" is defined af

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Yan, > > To Yan : > > * If you complete the commit to a repository of Andrew, I hope for > > release of pygui2.0.1. > > * We are going to release it in a site of Japan. > Hideo, all latest commits in "master" and "2.0" branch with "2.0.1" tag > have been pushed. I just confirmed it. Man

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Andrew, Hi Yan, > My bad, I didn't see Yan's reply. > He should have permissions now. Thank you for comment!! To Yan : * If you complete the commit to a repository of Andrew, I hope for release of pygui2.0.1. * We are going to release it in a site of Japan. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauch

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Andrew, Hi Yan, How did the matter that this repository could not reflect turn out? Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Mon, 2011/12/5, Gao,Yan wrote: > Hi Andrew, > > On 11/30/11 19:01, Gao,Yan wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > > On 11/28/11 07:53, Andrew Beekhof wrote: > >> On Thu, Nov 24,

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Yan, > Created 2.0 branch and tagged "pacemaker-mgmt-2.0.1" which is compatible > with pacemaker-1.0.x. > > https://github.com/gao-yan/pacemaker-mgmt/tree/2.0 Thanks!! > Please verify it before I pushed it to ClusterLabs. I just confirmed that I was not different in two next contents. * ga

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Yan, Hi Andrew, I confirmed movement in combination with Pacemaker1.0.12 in a repository of your test. * https://github.com/gao-yan/pacemaker-mgmt/commits/2.0-test On my test, both SNMP and GUI worked without a problem. Please release the contents of this repository as GUI for Pacemaker1.0

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Yan, > I pushed a new branch "2.0-test" which is supposed to be compatible with > pacemaker-1.0.x: > > https://github.com/gao-yan/pacemaker-mgmt/commits/2.0-test > > Could you please build and test it against pacemaker-1.0 branch? > > If everything works fine, I'll make a "2.0" branch and ta

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Yan, I confirmed contents. I think that I do not have any problem. I demand that I prepare the tag of 2.0.1 version that applied the next patch. * http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/pygui/rev/c08b84a8203f Because we want latest GUI for Pacemaker1.0. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Th

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Yan, Thank you for comment. > I've converted it, and for now put it to: > https://github.com/gao-yan/pacemaker-mgmt I watch contents. Cheers, Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Thu, 2011/11/24, Gao,Yan wrote: > Hi Hideo, > > On 11/24/11 15:48, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > Hi Yan, > > > > Ab

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Yan, About this matter, were you selected? Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Wed, 2011/9/21, Gao,Yan wrote: > > On 09/19/11 12:19, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > Hi Andrew, > > > >> I can create a place for it on clusterlabs.org or github if thats > >> where Yan would like it to

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Andrew, > I can create a place for it on clusterlabs.org or github if thats > where Yan would like it to live, but the conversion itself it for the > project owner to do (and verify) ;-) Thank you for comment. Wait for an opinion of Yan. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Mon, 2011/9/1

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Yan, Hi Andrew, Thank you for comment. > Hi Hideo, > > On 08/04/11 08:13, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > Hi Yan, > > > >> Pushed. Since we don't have a separate branch, you might need to > >> back-port this patch to pacemaker-mgmt-2.0.0, which is compatible with > >> pacemaker-1.0.x >

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Yan, > Pushed. Since we don't have a separate branch, you might need to > back-port this patch to pacemaker-mgmt-2.0.0, which is compatible with > pacemaker-1.0.x Thanks!! However, we need the release of pacemaker-mgmt for Pacemaker1.0. Is it impossible you apply a patch to a repository of p

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Yan, I confirmed that a trap was transmitted with a patch definitely. We request that we apply a patch to each pacemaker-mgmt of pacemaker1.0 and pacemaker1.1. * After this correction, pacemaker-mgmt of Pacemaker1.0 hopes that a new version is released.( pacemaker-mgmt-2.1.0 ? ) Thanks!

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Yan, > That attached patch places it at the end of the loop. I think it should > work. Please give it a test. Thank you for the making of the patch. I confirm movement and report a result. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Fri, 2011/7/29, Gao,Yan wrote: > > > On 07/29/11 08:29, renay

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Lars, Hi Yan, Hi All, Thank you for comment. > On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:43:00PM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > Hi Lars, > > Hi All, > > > > A cause to be delayed became clear. > > > > This problem occurs by a timing. > > > > When hbagent receives F_STATUS message while hbage

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Yan, > However, it is F_STATUS message of the considerably first stage that hbagent > performs queueing . > I pinpoint which hb_api of hbagent it is. I confirmed it. It is like the get_uuid processing that F_STATUS message is performed queueing of. --- The next log added FUNCTION macro to

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Yan, Thank you for comment. > > Hi Lars, > > Hi All, > > > > A cause to be delayed became clear. > > > > This problem occurs by a timing. > > > > When hbagent receives F_STATUS message while hbagent waits for a reply of > > the api communication, > Under this circumstance, is there a spec

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Lars, Hi All, A cause to be delayed became clear. This problem occurs by a timing. When hbagent receives F_STATUS message while hbagent waits for a reply of the api communication, F_STATUS is performed queueing of. When hbagent caught the event from Heartbeat, this message is handled. There

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Lars, Thank you for advice. I confirm the details of the problem using tools such as tcpdump again. Please wait Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Fri, 2011/7/22, Lars Ellenberg wrote: > On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:18:18AM +0900, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > > Hi Lars, > > >

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi Lars, Thank you for comment. > You get a *node* active. > Why do you think this is wrong? > Which timing would have been "proper", and why? When I examined it before, I changed a source and obtained the following result. I synchronized at the time of each node and took log. It is 16:44:41 t

Re: [Linux-HA] The active trap of the SNMP is delayed.

Hi All, We are troubled in the face of this problem. Please give advice. * This problem changed the destination of the mailing list to seem to be a problem of the HA. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- On Fri, 2011/6/17, renayama19661...@ybb.ne.jp wrote: > Hi All, > > I registered this pr

Re: [Linux-HA] pgsql and pgdba

Hi Serge, Hi Vadym, Sorry.I am busy. However, I agree to an opinion of Serge. I add a parameter and think it not to have any problem. Best Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- Vadym Chepkov wrote: > > On Sep 26, 2010, at 1:28 PM, Serge Dubrouski wrote: > > > I've been thinking about changing

Re: [Linux-HA] Python error with hb_gui on RHEL5

Hi, > So did anyone get it to work on RHEL5 ? Right now hb_gui is not useable > for me in any way. GUI moves on my RHEL5.2. Which version will GUI which you use be? Please compile latest GUI, and please use it. I can acquire the latest edition from the next link. - http://hg.clusterlabs.org/p

Re: Re : Re : [Linux-HA] Problem with GUI / Heartbeat 2.99

Hi, > Its a good idea to dispatch me the file. All right. I will send it later to your e-mail address. Regards, Hideo Yamauch. --- Mohamed SABIR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Its a good idea to dispatch me the file. > > Thanks in advance > > > > >

Re: [Linux-HA] Problem with GUI / Heartbeat 2.99

Hi, Probably I think your problem to be the same as the next link. - http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/linuxha/pacemaker/51982 Because Mr. Yan has already coped, please replace GUI. Regards, Hideo Yamauchi. --- Mohamed SABIR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a cluster with 2 n

[Linux-HA] RE:3rd Try: CentOS 5.2 and pacemaker

Hi, I met with the same phenomenon in RHEL5.2, too. In addition, this problem contacts Yan. >[root[at]m-nfs1 ~]# Traceback (most recent call last): >File "/usr/bin/hb_gui", line 2822, in on_add >objdlg = ObjectViewDlg(new_elem, True) >File "/usr/bin/hb_gui", line 3900, in __init__ >obj_view