On 2014-02-28T13:16:33, Digimer wrote:
> Assuming a SAN in each location (otherwise you have a single point of
> failure), then isn't it still possible to end up with a split-brain if/when
> the WAN link fails?
As I suggested a 3rd tie-breaker site (which, in the case of SBD, can be
any old iSCS
On 28/02/14 05:55 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2014-02-27T11:05:21, Digimer wrote:
So regardless of quorum, fencing is required. It is the only way to
reliably avoid split-brains. Unfortunately, fencing doesn't work on stretch
clusters.
For a two node stretch cluster, sbd can also be
On 28/02/14 04:17 AM, TRIBOLET Thomas wrote:
Hi,
I have taken a look at the documentation about booth. The problem is that it
need a third independent arbitrator on a third connection that I don't have,
which will grant or remove ticket.
My idea about fencing is to send an ssh command to rebo
On 2014-02-27T11:05:21, Digimer wrote:
> So regardless of quorum, fencing is required. It is the only way to
> reliably avoid split-brains. Unfortunately, fencing doesn't work on stretch
> clusters.
For a two node stretch cluster, sbd can also be used reliably as a
fencing mechanism.
It essen
-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org] de la part de Digimer
> [li...@alteeve.ca] Envoyé : jeudi 27 février 2014 17:05 À : General
> Linux-HA mailing list Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] 2 Nodes split brain,
> distant sites
>
> On 27/02/14 09:42 AM, TRIBOLET Thomas wrote:
>> 2) My prob
05
À : General Linux-HA mailing list
Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] 2 Nodes split brain, distant sites
On 27/02/14 09:42 AM, TRIBOLET Thomas wrote:
2) My problem :
When there is a network problem :
Ex :
a) first-node site lost internet connection ( and communication with
second-node at same time du
.@lists.linux-ha.org [linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org]
de la part de Digimer [li...@alteeve.ca]
Envoyé : jeudi 27 février 2014 17:05
À : General Linux-HA mailing list
Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] 2 Nodes split brain, distant sites
On 27/02/14 09:42 AM, TRIBOLET Thomas wrote:
> 2) My proble
On 27/02/14 09:42 AM, TRIBOLET Thomas wrote:
2) My problem :
When there is a network problem :
Ex :
a) first-node site lost internet connection ( and communication with
second-node at same time due to vpn on internet connection )
b) cluster stop openvpn on first node and launch it on seco
Hi,
my first idea would be to fix binnetaddr. It should be the
networkaddress not the machines network address.
Regards
Fabian
On 02/27/2014 03:42 PM, TRIBOLET Thomas wrote:
Hello,
Before starting, my first language is French so I'll try to do my best to
explain my problem in English.
1)
Hello,
Before starting, my first language is French so I'll try to do my best to
explain my problem in English.
1) The situation :
I have 2 servers on 2 distant site.
I need to run openvpn with the same configuration on the 2 servers.
But it must run only on one server at a time.
I want
10 matches
Mail list logo
