Hello,
while testing version 2.1.1. I found a change in behaviour
when a resource in a group failed. If there are resources
a b c d e f in the group G, and e failed this happens:
2.0.8: stop f, stop e, start e, start f
2.1.1: stop f, stop e, start a, start b, ..., start f
What is the reasoni
On 7/17/07, Peter Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
while testing version 2.1.1. I found a change in behaviour
when a resource in a group failed. If there are resources
a b c d e f in the group G, and e failed this happens:
2.0.8: stop f, stop e, start e, start f
2.1.1: stop f, stop e,
On 2007-07-17T12:25:48, Peter Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while testing version 2.1.1. I found a change in behaviour
> when a resource in a group failed. If there are resources
> a b c d e f in the group G, and e failed this happens:
>
> 2.0.8: stop f, stop e, start e, start
Hi,
Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2007-07-17T12:25:48, Peter Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Good question. I assume Andrew has a good explanation when you have the
testcase (pe inputs). ;-)
done, bug #1648
But, this is safe by definition.
true.
What problem is this causing for you?
I
