Hi,
in fact, it was the udev rule for /dev/misc/ocfs2_control which was
missing .
Thanks.
Alain
> > but in this case, the script o2cb does not even start the daemon
> > successfully :
> > daemon err o2cb ERROR: Could not start /sbin/ocfs2_controld.pcmk
>
>
> Is that where the daemon lives?
>
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Alain.Moulle wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've all re-configured with dlm and o2cb as clone in Pacemaker
> configuration,
> but unfortunately, all works fine on one node, but as soon as the clone o2cb
> starts on second node, both nodes crash .
>
> So I've got the last releases
Sorry , the real error message is :
daemon err o2cb ERROR: ocfs2_controld.pcmk did not come up
Alain
Hi
I've all re-configured with dlm and o2cb as clone in Pacemaker
configuration,
but unfortunately, all works fine on one node, but as soon as the clone o2cb
starts on second node, both nodes cr
Hi
I've all re-configured with dlm and o2cb as clone in Pacemaker
configuration,
but unfortunately, all works fine on one node, but as soon as the clone o2cb
starts on second node, both nodes crash .
So I've got the last releases of ocfs2 pcmk and the last module in
kernel, all recompiled on e
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Alain.Moulle wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I've have a look in the external/sdb device, it seems to be useful
> only if we don't use a "by network" fencing solution , so as I'm
> using fence_ipmilan, perhaps this shared device is not useful
> in my case , right ?
Correc
Hi again,
I've have a look in the external/sdb device, it seems to be useful
only if we don't use a "by network" fencing solution , so as I'm
using fence_ipmilan, perhaps this shared device is not useful
in my case , right ?
Regards
ALain
___
Linux-HA m
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Alain.Moulle wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> sorry to come again on this subject, I was about to switch to OCFS2 in
> Pacemaker but :
>
> For configuration , I'm using the documentation "Oracle Cluster File
> System 2",
> I think it is always correct/valid ?
>
> It seems t
Hi Andrew,
sorry to come again on this subject, I was about to switch to OCFS2 in
Pacemaker but :
For configuration , I'm using the documentation "Oracle Cluster File
System 2",
I think it is always correct/valid ?
It seems that o2cb/dlm need an external/sdb (with /dev/sdb2 partition)
"for he
Hi Andrew,
ok I'm convinced now.
I'll change the configuration.
Thanks
Alain
> A bunch of filesystem guys and cluster guys got together and thought
> through all the corners cases[1] that were possible and decided that
> having a resource manager in charge of a cluster FS that was using an
> intern
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Alain.Moulle wrote:
>>
>> sorry but I don't fully understand :
>> >
>> > ?- I don't think there is any "fencing" functionnality in the OCFS2
>> > management,
>>
>>
>> there is suicide, but that is unrelated to my point
>>
> Ok I didn't not know, but this could not
>
> sorry but I don't fully understand :
> >
> > ?- I don't think there is any "fencing" functionnality in the OCFS2
> > management,
>
>
> there is suicide, but that is unrelated to my point
>
Ok I didn't not know, but this could not be disturbing for Pacemaker ,
could it ?
It's quite as if
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Alain.Moulle wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> sorry but I don't fully understand :
>
> - I don't think there is any "fencing" functionnality in the OCFS2
> management,
there is suicide, but that is unrelated to my point
> so for me the membership information remains o
Hi Andrew,
sorry but I don't fully understand :
- I don't think there is any "fencing" functionnality in the OCFS2
management,
so for me the membership information remains only at
Pacemaker/corosync level.
- I want all the FS OCFS2 always mounted on both sides , so from Pacemaker
point o
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Alain.Moulle wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have a "philosophic" question about two nodes with FS under OCFS2
> and Pacemaker/corosync for the HA of both nodes.
>
> My choice was to let OCFS2 stack out of Pacemaker configuration,
> so I let the services o2cb and ocfs2 started a
Hi
I have a "philosophic" question about two nodes with FS under OCFS2
and Pacemaker/corosync for the HA of both nodes.
My choice was to let OCFS2 stack out of Pacemaker configuration,
so I let the services o2cb and ocfs2 started at boot time.
And I only configure some FS of type OCFS2 as clone
15 matches
Mail list logo
