On 29/08/2013, at 5:28 PM, Alex Sudakar wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Ulrich Windl
> wrote:
>
>> After some short thinking I find that using ssh as STONITH is probably the
>> wrong thing to do, because it can never STONITH if the target is down
>> already.
>>
>> Maybe some shared
On 29/08/2013, at 4:18 PM, Ulrich Windl
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> After some short thinking I find that using ssh as STONITH is probably the
> wrong thing to do, because it can never STONITH if the target is down already.
Correct
> (Is it documented that a STONITH operation should work independent f
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Ulrich Windl
wrote:
> After some short thinking I find that using ssh as STONITH is probably the
> wrong thing to do, because it can never STONITH if the target is down already.
>
> Maybe some shared storage and a mechanism like sbd is the way to go.
> With everyt
Hi!
After some short thinking I find that using ssh as STONITH is probably the
wrong thing to do, because it can never STONITH if the target is down already.
(Is it documented that a STONITH operation should work independent from the
target being up or down?)
Maybe some shared storage and a mech
