Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2007-04-05T08:46:40, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My only comment on this is that if having two copies of your resource
agent running at once causes serious problems, you need to _strongly_
consider re-writing you agent to have sufficient locking /
On 2007-04-05T08:46:40, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My only comment on this is that if having two copies of your resource
agent running at once causes serious problems, you need to _strongly_
consider re-writing you agent to have sufficient locking / atomicity. Or
it will come
Hi,
Can a RA script know if the clone resource has set ordered=true or
interleave=true? Is this information somewhere set in a variable, like the
OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_clone_max for the information about maximum number of
clones in a resource?
Thanks.
--
Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
MultiNET
On 4/5/07, Michael Schwartzkopff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can a RA script know if the clone resource has set ordered=true or
interleave=true? Is this information somewhere set in a variable, like the
OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_clone_max for the information about maximum number of
clones in a
Am Donnerstag, 5. April 2007 13:52 schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
On 4/5/07, Michael Schwartzkopff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Can a RA script know if the clone resource has set ordered=true or
interleave=true? Is this information somewhere set in a variable, like
the
Michael Schwartzkopff wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 5. April 2007 15:35 schrieb Alan Robertson:
So, at the moment, you really just want to make sure you're configured
correctly. Is that right?
Yes.
My only comment on this is that if having two copies of your resource
agent running at once
Alan Robertson wrote:
Carson Gaspar wrote:
My only comment on this is that if having two copies of your resource
agent running at once causes serious problems, you need to _strongly_
consider re-writing you agent to have sufficient locking / atomicity. Or
it will come back to bite you some
Carson Gaspar schrieb:
My only comment on this is that if having two copies of your resource
agent running at once causes serious problems, you need to _strongly_
consider re-writing you agent to have sufficient locking / atomicity.
Or it will come back to bite you some day...
Hi,
have
Carson Gaspar wrote:
Alan Robertson wrote:
Carson Gaspar wrote:
My only comment on this is that if having two copies of your resource
agent running at once causes serious problems, you need to _strongly_
consider re-writing you agent to have sufficient locking / atomicity. Or
it will come
