Peter Kruse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> thanks for this discussion.
>
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On 4/19/07, Peter Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> the PE makes zero distinction between them and since it's the one
>> doing the asking i believe that it is its "meaning" that counts.
>
> yes, think s
Hello,
thanks for this discussion.
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 4/19/07, Peter Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the PE makes zero distinction between them and since it's the one
doing the asking i believe that it is its "meaning" that counts.
yes, think so, too.
> both ask the same question:
On 4/19/07, Peter Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 4/19/07, Peter Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The point is: the _meaning_ of probe is different to monitor:
>
> no, its not. trust me :-)
what do you mean? of course it's different!
i mean, that there is
Hi,
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 4/19/07, Peter Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The point is: the _meaning_ of probe is different to monitor:
no, its not. trust me :-)
what do you mean? of course it's different!
both ask the same question: "Is this resource running?"
yes, but the conseq
On 4/19/07, Peter Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 4/19/07, Keisuke MORI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Answering Andrew's question above would help clarify which:
>> > "Why do you think you need to know?"
Th
Hello,
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 4/19/07, Keisuke MORI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Answering Andrew's question above would help clarify which:
> "Why do you think you need to know?"
The point is: the _meaning_ of probe is different to monitor:
On 4/19/07, Keisuke MORI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Answering Andrew's question above would help clarify which:
> "Why do you think you need to know?"
What I want to do is similar to MailTo RA, which is a pseudo RA
that has no acutual applicatio
Alan Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>> On 4/17/07, Keisuke MORI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The official document on the web mentions about how to
>>> distinguish between probe and monitor that you can tell by
>>> referring to the value of OCF_RESKEY_CR
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
> On 4/17/07, Keisuke MORI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The official document on the web mentions about how to
>> distinguish between probe and monitor that you can tell by
>> referring to the value of OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_interval
>> as cited below.
>>
>> But as lon
Sorry for sending the same mail again and again.
I resent it because I've got an error mail from the mail server
so I thought it was failed...
--
Keisuke MORI
NTT DATA Intellilink Corporation
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org
http:
On 4/17/07, Keisuke MORI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The official document on the web mentions about how to
distinguish between probe and monitor that you can tell by
referring to the value of OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_interval
as cited below.
But as long as I tested, OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_interval
Hi,
The official document on the web mentions about how to
distinguish between probe and monitor that you can tell by
referring to the value of OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_interval
as cited below.
But as long as I tested, OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_interval is not set
only when probe. (for regular monitors, it
Hi,
The official document on the web mentions about how to
distinguish between probe and monitor that you can tell by
referring to the value of OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_interval
as cited below.
But as long as I tested, OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_interval is not set
only when probe. (for regular monitors, it
Hi,
The official document on the web mentions about how to
distinguish between probe and monitor that you can tell by
referring to the value of OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_interval
as cited below.
But as long as I tested, OCF_RESKEY_CRM_meta_interval is not set
only when probe. (for regular monitors, it
14 matches
Mail list logo
