Re: [Linux-HA] Relevance of STONITH with Xen over DRBD setup

2007-12-14 Thread Dominik Klein
I just want to confirm this. From what i've learned so far, STONITH is relevant only to avoid data corruption when using shared storage. So, is STONITH relevant when i'm using a non-shared setup with Heartbeat and XEN VM on top of DRBD? Xen is using file images created on top of a ext3 FS on top

RE: [Linux-HA] Relevance of STONITH with Xen over DRBD setup

2007-12-13 Thread Rodrigo Pereira
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 05:23:28PM -, Rodrigo Pereira wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 06:42:59PM -, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote: Hello, I just want to confirm this. From what i've learned so far, STONITH is relevant only to avoid data corruption when

Re: [Linux-HA] Relevance of STONITH with Xen over DRBD setup

2007-12-13 Thread Dejan Muhamedagic
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 05:23:28PM -, Rodrigo Pereira wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 06:42:59PM -, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote: Hello, I just want to confirm this. From what i've learned so far, STONITH is relevant only to avoid data corruption when using

RE: [Linux-HA] Relevance of STONITH with Xen over DRBD setup

2007-12-12 Thread Rodrigo Pereira
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 06:42:59PM -, Rodrigo Borges Pereira wrote: Hello, I just want to confirm this. From what i've learned so far, STONITH is relevant only to avoid data corruption when using shared storage. So, is STONITH relevant when i'm using a non-shared setup

[Linux-HA] Relevance of STONITH with Xen over DRBD setup

2007-12-11 Thread Rodrigo Borges Pereira
Hello, I just want to confirm this. From what i've learned so far, STONITH is relevant only to avoid data corruption when using shared storage. So, is STONITH relevant when i'm using a non-shared setup with Heartbeat and XEN VM on top of DRBD? Xen is using file images created on top of a ext3 FS