!
Is this status has changed since 2010 ? I dont' think so when watching
all the messages
on Mailing List ... but I'm not sure ...
Thanks
Alain
De : Andreas Kurz andr...@hastexo.com
A : linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Date : 02/02/2012 15:47
Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Status about ocfs2.pcmk
/2012 15:47
Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Status about ocfs2.pcmk ?
Envoyé par :linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org
On 02/02/2012 02:54 PM, alain.mou...@bull.net wrote:
Hi
Just wonder if someone has succeded to configured a working HA
configuration with Pacemaker/corosync
and OCFS2 file systems
the messages
on Mailing List ... but I'm not sure ..
I have the same impression, yes.
Regards,
Andreas
Thanks
Alain
De :Andreas Kurz andr...@hastexo.com
A : linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Date : 02/02/2012 15:47
Objet : Re: [Linux-HA] Status about ocfs2.pcmk ?
Envoyé par
Hi
Just wonder if someone has succeded to configured a working HA
configuration with Pacemaker/corosync
and OCFS2 file systems, meaning using ocfs2.pcmk , on RHEL6 mainly (and
eventually SLES11) ?
(I tried at the end of 2010 but gave up after a few weeks because it was
not working at all)
On 02/02/2012 02:54 PM, alain.mou...@bull.net wrote:
Hi
Just wonder if someone has succeded to configured a working HA
configuration with Pacemaker/corosync
and OCFS2 file systems, meaning using ocfs2.pcmk , on RHEL6 mainly (and
eventually SLES11) ?
For RHEL6 I'd recommend you go with
