> On 17 Jan 2015, at 4:19 am, Digimer wrote:
>
> On 16/01/15 10:43 AM, Dmitri Maziuk wrote:
>> On 1/16/2015 8:39 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>>> On 2015-01-16T11:56:04, "EXTERNAL Konold Martin (erfrakon,
>> RtP2/TEF72)" wrote:
>>>
I have been told that support for DRBD is supposed to be
> On 18 Jan 2015, at 3:45 am, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
>
> On 2015-01-16T16:25:15, "EXTERNAL Konold Martin (erfrakon, RtP2/TEF72)"
> wrote:
>
>> I am glad to hear that SLE HA has no plans to drop support for DRBD.
>>
>> Unfortunately I currently cannot disclose who is spreading this false
On 1/16/2015 8:26 PM, Digimer wrote:
... CentOS aims to repackage RHEL
RPMs exactly, then changes only trademarks. Gluster is, as I understand
it, fully open source so I can see no reason, from a general position,
why gluster's RPMs on CentOS should be treated any differently.
Because the stra
On 2015-01-16T16:25:15, "EXTERNAL Konold Martin (erfrakon, RtP2/TEF72)"
wrote:
> I am glad to hear that SLE HA has no plans to drop support for DRBD.
>
> Unfortunately I currently cannot disclose who is spreading this false
> information.
Too bad. Do let them know they're quite wrong though ;
On 16/01/15 07:29 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
On 01/16/2015 05:33 PM, Digimer wrote:
1. CentOS replicates RHEL, "warts and all".
Not exactly. E.g. gluster is a for-pay RHEL add-on. There's some kind of
gluster rpm in Centos but it's pretty much disfunctional: you have to
remove that, add the up
On 01/16/2015 05:33 PM, Digimer wrote:
> 1. CentOS replicates RHEL, "warts and all".
Not exactly. E.g. gluster is a for-pay RHEL add-on. There's some kind of
gluster rpm in Centos but it's pretty much disfunctional: you have to
remove that, add the upstream gluster repo and get your gluster from
On 16/01/15 01:50 PM, Dimitri Maziuk wrote:
On 01/16/2015 11:19 AM, Digimer wrote:
When RHEL 6 was released, Red Hat wanted to reduce their support
overhead a lot. So many things that used to be supported were dropped.
DRBD, unlike most other dropped programs, is still supported, just not
by RH
On 01/16/2015 11:19 AM, Digimer wrote:
> When RHEL 6 was released, Red Hat wanted to reduce their support
> overhead a lot. So many things that used to be supported were dropped.
> DRBD, unlike most other dropped programs, is still supported, just not
> by RH directly. They worked out an agreement
On 16/01/15 10:43 AM, Dmitri Maziuk wrote:
On 1/16/2015 8:39 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2015-01-16T11:56:04, "EXTERNAL Konold Martin (erfrakon,
RtP2/TEF72)" wrote:
I have been told that support for DRBD is supposed to be phased
out from both SLES and RHEL in the near future.
This i
im Auftrag von Lars Marowsky-Bree
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Januar 2015 15:39
An: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Betreff: Re: [Linux-HA] Support for DRDB
On 2015-01-16T11:56:04, "EXTERNAL Konold Martin (erfrakon, RtP2/TEF72)"
wrote:
> I have been told that support for DRBD is supposed
On 1/16/2015 8:39 AM, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2015-01-16T11:56:04, "EXTERNAL Konold Martin (erfrakon,
RtP2/TEF72)" wrote:
I have been told that support for DRBD is supposed to be phased
out from both SLES and RHEL in the near future.
This is massively incorrect for SLE HA. (drbd is p
On 2015-01-16T11:56:04, "EXTERNAL Konold Martin (erfrakon, RtP2/TEF72)"
wrote:
> I have been told that support for DRBD is supposed to be phased out from both
> SLES and RHEL in the near future.
This is massively incorrect for SLE HA. (drbd is part of the HA add-on,
not SLES.) We have absolute
Hi,
I have been told that support for DRBD is supposed to be phased out from both
SLES and RHEL in the near future.
Are any of you aware this or is this a false claim?
Yours
--martin
P.S.: Of course support from LINBIT should be available even if SuSE or Redhat
will not support it anymore
13 matches
Mail list logo
