list; 'Simon Horman'
Cc: 'lvs-devel'; 'Julian Anastasov'
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] UDP / DHCP / LDIRECTORD
Hi,
It looks like there also might be a memory leak in this patch.. over the last
few months we have seen memory grow slowly but lately the traffic has increased
: General Linux-HA mailing list; 'Simon Horman'
Cc: 'lvs-devel'; 'Julian Anastasov'
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] UDP / DHCP / LDIRECTORD
Apparently this is related to some sort of race condition (possibly a problem
with my ldirectord start script which does an ed
: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org
[mailto:linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org] On Behalf Of Brian Carpio
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 3:47 PM
To: 'Simon Horman'
Cc: 'lvs-devel'; 'Julian Anastasov'; 'linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org'
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA
arpio
Senior Systems Engineer
Office: +1.303.962.7242
Mobile: +1.720.319.8617
Email: bcar...@broadhop.com
-Original Message-
From: Brian Carpio
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2010 1:57 PM
To: Simon Horman
Cc: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org; lvs-devel; Julian Anastasov
Subject: RE: [Linux-HA] UDP
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:57:29PM -0700, Brian Carpio wrote:
> Simon,
>
> Thanks again for all of your hard work, I have sent over a million UDP DHCP
> packets at the new kernel/ipvsadm with the patches applied and currently the
> only issue (which you know about already) is that ldirectord doe
-
From: Simon Horman [mailto:ho...@verge.net.au]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 8:56 PM
To: Brian Carpio
Cc: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org; lvs-devel; Julian Anastasov
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] UDP / DHCP / LDIRECTORD
Hi Brian,
here are some patches to test.
I have only lightly tested them to the e
Thanks so much!! We will start testing this today!
Brian Carpio
-Original Message-
From: Simon Horman [mailto:ho...@verge.net.au]
Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 8:56 PM
To: Brian Carpio
Cc: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org; lvs-devel; Julian Anastasov
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] UDP / DHCP
Hi Brian,
here are some patches to test.
I have only lightly tested them to the extent that they
compile and appear to configure a valid service.
You can enable one packet scheduling (OPS) by passing the -o option
to ipvsadm when creating a virtual service.
e.g.
# ipvsadm -A -u
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:00:40AM +1000, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 08:42:31AM -0700, Brian Carpio wrote:
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > I'm sure you are very busy so I even hate to bug you about this but do
> > you know if/when you will be able to integrate these patches into the
> > 2
On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 01:09:44PM +0800, Henry wrote:
> Simon:
>
>
>
> What is an example command to set the timeout of UDP connection? I am trying
> to set a low timeout for SIP UDP packets. And am I able to control the UDP
> timeout parameter from "ldirectord" instead of doing it with ipvsad
Simon:
What is an example command to set the timeout of UDP connection? I am trying
to set a low timeout for SIP UDP packets. And am I able to control the UDP
timeout parameter from "ldirectord" instead of doing it with ipvsadm
command?
Henry
"Hi Brian,
I think that the proble
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 08:42:31AM -0700, Brian Carpio wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> I'm sure you are very busy so I even hate to bug you about this but do
> you know if/when you will be able to integrate these patches into the
> 2.6.33 or the 2.6.18-128 kernel, we are more then willing to test this
> pa
arpio
-Original Message-
From: linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org
[mailto:linux-ha-boun...@lists.linux-ha.org] On Behalf Of Simon Horman
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 5:19 PM
To: General Linux-HA mailing list
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] UDP / DHCP / LDIRECTORD
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:37:42AM
Linux-HA mailing list
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] UDP / DHCP / LDIRECTORD
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:37:42AM -0700, Brian Carpio wrote:
> Simon,
>
> Thank you very much, this would be very beneficial for us to get
> working.. I did try the timeout value as you suggested and if I onl
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 11:37:42AM -0700, Brian Carpio wrote:
> Simon,
>
> Thank you very much, this would be very beneficial for us to get
> working.. I did try the timeout value as you suggested and if I only send
> one request every second (since that appears to be as low as I can make
> it) th
s
into the 2.6 kernel as this appears to be exactly what we need?
Thanks again,
Brian Carpio
-Original Message-
From: Simon Horman [mailto:ho...@verge.net.au]
Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2010 5:22 PM
To: Brian Carpio
Cc: linux-ha@lists.linux-ha.org
Subject: Re: [Linux-HA] UDP / DHCP / LDI
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:57:36PM -0700, Brian Carpio wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently I have a very unique situation where I need to load balance DHCP
> ACKs to two different real servers, my issue (and this hopefully is just a
> simple configuration issue) is that when we test our ldirectord load b
Hi,
Currently I have a very unique situation where I need to load balance DHCP ACKs
to two different real servers, my issue (and this hopefully is just a simple
configuration issue) is that when we test our ldirectord load balacner all the
DHCP ACKs go to a single "real server" if the source p
18 matches
Mail list logo
