> I've went through something similar, and this could be
> the case as well, the combined score for the group is higher
> than the resource-stickiness value, setting it to a much higher
> value (or even inf:) would do the job.
I'll give that a try!
--
Eric Robinson
Disclaimer - November 24,
On Nov 24, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Dan Frincu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Vadym Chepkov wrote:
>> On Nov 24, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Robinson, Eric wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I performed a "power-plug-pull" test on my newest cluster and it failed
>>> over as expected. However, when I restored power to the "failed" node,
>>>
Hi,
Vadym Chepkov wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Robinson, Eric wrote:
>
>
>> I performed a "power-plug-pull" test on my newest cluster and it failed
>> over as expected. However, when I restored power to the "failed" node,
>> the resources failed back. I don't understand why this happen
On Nov 24, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Robinson, Eric wrote:
> I performed a "power-plug-pull" test on my newest cluster and it failed
> over as expected. However, when I restored power to the "failed" node,
> the resources failed back. I don't understand why this happened since I
> have resource stickines
I performed a "power-plug-pull" test on my newest cluster and it failed
over as expected. However, when I restored power to the "failed" node,
the resources failed back. I don't understand why this happened since I
have resource stickiness set.
There are three nodes in the cluster. I pulled the p
