On 2007-12-19T21:19:48, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave, Dejan and (if possible) Lars:
I have put this patch into 'test'. PLEASE begin testing it at your
earliest convenience.
Is there any specific reason why you did not push it into dev?
Regards,
Lars
--
Teamlead
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:43:21AM +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote:
On 2007-12-19T21:19:48, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave, Dejan and (if possible) Lars:
I have put this patch into 'test'. PLEASE begin testing it at your
earliest convenience.
Is there any specific
Junko IKEDA wrote:
Thanks a lot!
Would you take in this fix to 2.1.3?
I hope it's not too late.
OK... It's a regression - and I don't think our tests catch this case,
so I doubt it will affect the outcome of tests. Nevertheless...
Dave, Dejan and (if possible) Lars:
I have put this patch
Sorry for the delay...
On Dec 17, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Junko IKEDA wrote:
Hi,
I am testing some monitor operation behaviors,
and find a different one between 2.1.2 and dev(2.1.3).
when I run 2.1.2, it incremented a fail count if a monitor operation
timed
out.
but with dev, it doesn't up the
Thanks a lot!
Would you take in this fix to 2.1.3?
I hope it's not too late.
Junko
Sorry for the delay...
On Dec 17, 2007, at 12:08 PM, Junko IKEDA wrote:
Hi,
I am testing some monitor operation behaviors,
and find a different one between 2.1.2 and dev(2.1.3).
when I run 2.1.2,
